"I've been lucky enough to have the career that I've had these past eight years that I'm definitely going to have a lot of options," Juszczyk said last week during a podcast interview. "But I also absolutely love San Francisco. I love playing for Kyle (Shanahan). I love playing for Mike McDaniel. Bobby Turner, my running back coach, is an absolute OG. I want to send him out the right way.
"But there's a lot more factors that come into play now. I'm 29 years old. I've been married for a while. We want to start a family soon. It's tough because our whole family is on the East Coast, and being out there on the West Coast, it's tough to really have our first child and basically be alone. That's something I have to think about and weigh in on my decision."
One fan asked Matt Barrows of The Athletic why the 49ers don't just use the franchise tag on Juszczyk. After all, he is the highest-paid fullback by a significant margin. Earning $5.25 million per year, an average of the top five fullback salaries would actually reduce Juszczyk's cost.
There's just one problem with that line of thinking: There is no franchise tag for fullbacks. They fall into a different category completely.
Wrote Barrows: "Juszczyk would fall under the running back category, and that franchise number is roughly $11 million, which is double what Juszczyk might get."
Then you have the 49ers salary-cap constraints. The team has about $13.4 million in space, according to OverTheCap.com. San Francisco doesn't have the room to use the franchise tag on anyone right now because it would be guaranteed money for one year. Multi-year deals would allow the 49ers to push some of the financial impact to future years, hoping the salary cap corrects itself by then. That's why multi-year deals for players like Juszczyk and tackle Trent Williams are better.
San Francisco can't use the franchise tag on Williams anyway, due to a clause within his reworked contract.
Where does Barrows feel Juszczyk fits in the team's offseason priorities? Right behind its top-priority — Williams — and above cornerback Jason Verrett.
"I put Juszczyk above Verrett because I think the dropoff from Juszczyk to an alternative fullback is greater than that between Verrett and another cornerback the team can bring in," explains Barrows.
Click here to read the entire mailbag over at The Athletic.
More San Francisco 49ers News
-
Why the 49ers can't underestimate Philip Rivers in clash with Colts
The San Francisco 49ers defense will face Philip Rivers on Monday night. The 44-year-old recently came out of retirement to sign with the Indianapolis Colts following Daniel Jones' season-ending injury. The 49ers know Rivers well. Head coach Kyle Shanahan and the front office... -
49ers mailbag: What's up with Jordan Elliott's knee? Can SF stop Jonathan Taylor? What's on the 49ers' list for Santa?
The San Francisco 49ers are gearing up for the final push toward the 2025 postseason. How far they will be able to go will depend on their health and how many young players perform. Especially since some are reserves who are playing for injured players. We opened the 49ers... -
49ers Keys to Victory vs. Colts: How San Francisco Can Win in Week 16
As the San Francisco 49ers head into a critical Week 16 matchup against the Indianapolis Colts, the margin for error is slim. With playoff positioning on the line, the 49ers must lean into their identity, execute with discipline, and control the game from start to finish. This... -
Why the 49ers have no quarterback debate
Monday night, as I was about to order my Panda Express dinner before the game, the man in front of me asked if I thought quarterback Brock Purdy was good and how he compared to Mac Jones. He was a Patriots fan who felt Mac had gotten a raw deal in New England, but I told him...