There are 358 users in the forums
Originally posted by ninerbrand:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
... its a part of baseball.
99% of the time the catcher is not going to break his leg on a collision at home plate
Originally posted by ninerbrand:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
... its a part of baseball.
99% of the time the catcher is not going to break his leg on a collision at home plate
Originally posted by YungAce:Originally posted by ninerbrand:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
... its a part of baseball.
99% of the time the catcher is not going to break his leg on a collision at home plate
this is so true
Originally posted by SportsFan:Originally posted by ninerbrand:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
... its a part of baseball.
99% of the time the catcher is not going to break his leg on a collision at home plate
I think it is a bulls**t play. He didn't have to run Posey here as he had a clear lane to hook slide. A little cheap in my opinion.
Originally posted by ninerbrand:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
... its a part of baseball.
99% of the time the catcher is not going to break his leg on a collision at home plate
Originally posted by jimrat201:Originally posted by SportsFan:Originally posted by ninerbrand:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
... its a part of baseball.
99% of the time the catcher is not going to break his leg on a collision at home plate
I think it is a bulls**t play. He didn't have to run Posey here as he had a clear lane to hook slide. A little cheap in my opinion.
True had an open plate but chose to crush him.............someone gonna get beaned tonight.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by jimrat201:Originally posted by SportsFan:Originally posted by ninerbrand:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
... its a part of baseball.
99% of the time the catcher is not going to break his leg on a collision at home plate
I think it is a bulls**t play. He didn't have to run Posey here as he had a clear lane to hook slide. A little cheap in my opinion.
True had an open plate but chose to crush him.............someone gonna get beaned tonight.
I doubt Cousins will see the field for this last game and the Giants arent going to "bean" an innocent player. It would be a stupid thing to do.
Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Cousins isn't in the lineup for the Marlins
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Cousins isn't in the lineup for the Marlins
Originally posted by SportsFan:Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by jimrat201:Originally posted by SportsFan:Originally posted by ninerbrand:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
... its a part of baseball.
99% of the time the catcher is not going to break his leg on a collision at home plate
I think it is a bulls**t play. He didn't have to run Posey here as he had a clear lane to hook slide. A little cheap in my opinion.
True had an open plate but chose to crush him.............someone gonna get beaned tonight.
I doubt Cousins will see the field for this last game and the Giants arent going to "bean" an innocent player. It would be a stupid thing to do.
Someone doesn't watch much baseball.
Even if Cousins was on the field he wouldn't be beaned. They would bean Florida's best player.
Originally posted by jrg:Originally posted by jimrat201:
They need to revamp the bowling over the catcher rule, if you can run over a catcher, why not run over the SS/2nd basemen on double plays....................venting
I'm sorry for Posey's injury, but I completely disagree.
What Cousins did was based on how the game was going. If he scores there..Marlins take the lead...it's already extra innings. You gotta know he had some extra adrenaline going there. I'm pretty sure Cousins wasn't trying to hurt Posey, but simply hit him hard enough to knock the ball lose so his team can take the lead.
It's just unfortunate on how Posey's leg/body was set at the time that the way he fell ended up injuring him pretty badly.
Again, I'm sorry for your guys loss...as a Cardinals fan and losing Wainwright for the year, I can understand how bad this hurts...but I don't think any rules need to be changed.
If the Giants come back and bean someone and TRY to hurt somebody tonight, I find that pathetic. It's part of the game..and if it was Posey running over John Buck, I think you'd feel a little differently.
