There are 260 users in the forums

status of barry bonds trial--what do you think/hope happens

Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Val - do you think Twitter is the best bet to get the result the fastest?

Yes, and i just checked and it says that there was a mistake and there is still no verdict
  • DRnSFw
  • BlessUp
  • Posts: 67,791
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Val - do you think Twitter is the best bet to get the result the fastest?

Yes, and i just checked and it says that there was a mistake and there is still no verdict

are you serious?
  • Otter
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 22,936
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
We the jury find Barry Bonds.... to be kind of a dick in general.

You wants that I insert Mel Gibson here ^^
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Val - do you think Twitter is the best bet to get the result the fastest?

Yes, and i just checked and it says that there was a mistake and there is still no verdict

yeah - saw that.
http://twitter.com/markfwespn
  • Otter
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 22,936
Hung jury?

And with only 4 men, that's even more impressive. beat you to the hung joke.
KNBR reported no verdict. Jury pumped faked.
Originally posted by Otter:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
We the jury find Barry Bonds.... to be kind of a dick in general.

You wants that I insert Mel Gibson here ^^





markfwespn

judge: believe we will be told jury has reached agreement on som not all counts


markfwespn

Lawyers debating how they want to proceed, what to tell jury before they enter
  • boast
  • Hella Fame
  • Posts: 149,567
better be not guilty or i'm gonna have to shank a webzoner

Originally posted by boast:
better be not guilty or i'm gonna have to shank a webzoner

yep! You can borrow this one I just made out of my comb, in case. I made a list of candidates if you need it also.
markfwespn
judge: believe we will be told jury has reached agreement on som not all counts

markfwespn
Confusion about what jury actually has informed court

markfwespn
Clerk; jury first said they had verdict, needed forms, told them to destroy notes, then said, wait, reached verdict on 1 but not all

markfwespn
Clerk: jury not ready to destroy notes. ... Clear jury want clear on whether it wanted to continue deliberating other counts

markfwespn
Lawyers now discussing how they want to proceed. Defense: let's send them a note to get more clarification


markfwespn
Judge: they haven't said anything about deadlock; we're assuming that's where they are


markfwespn
Judge will send in note asking for clarity in form of note from foreperson

markfwespn
Lawyers now crafting note they agree upon. Could take a while. So bizarre

markfwespn
Judge: jury should be told not to tell us in numbers or otherwise where they stand on undecided counts

markfwespn
Judge doesn't like notes, calling jury in to explain themselves

markfwespn
Jury in. Foreman: haven't reached on all, but reached on one
markfwespn
Defense: judge should order mistrial on other counts, let's hear ruling on count they have

markfwespn

Govt seems to agree. Judge: think wise, given they're convinced they can't do anything else
[ Edited by valrod33 on Apr 13, 2011 at 2:15 PM ]
Originally posted by valrod33:
markfwespn
Defense: judge should order mistrial on other counts, let's hear ruling on count they have

markfwespn

Govt seems to agree. Judge: think wise, given they're convinced they can't do anything else

oh they are messing this junk up.
Have a verdict on one, judge is gonna declare a mistrial on the other counts
Share 49ersWebzone