There are 181 users in the forums
***2009/10 USC Football Thread****
Aug 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM
- Hollywood49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,287
Corp is out 1-2 weeks, this could be Barkleys time to steal the job.
Aug 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM
- nipplehead
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,963
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Corp is out 1-2 weeks, this could be Barkleys time to steal the job.
We might be better off with Barkley in the long run. He's way more talented than Corp; if Barkley grasps the offense, he's going to be golden.
Obviously 18-year-old true freshmen are a little worrisome since they turn the ball over a lot, but you can't deny his talent.
Put it this way - I'm a lot less worried this year with Corp's injury than I was last year with Sanchez's knee injury.
Aug 13, 2009 at 10:49 AM
- SolRebe1
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,446
I thought Mitch was gonna get a chance. Poor guy transferred from Arkansas.
Aug 13, 2009 at 10:53 AM
- Hollywood49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,287
I thought Mitch was gonna start but I guess Corp was better in spring ball.
Aug 13, 2009 at 11:39 AM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 59,872
I say take your lumps and start Barkely. At worst you guys will be playing us in the Hawaii Bowl!!!
Aug 13, 2009 at 8:49 PM
- SolRebe1
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,446
USC and the rest of the Pac-10 get noooo love.
Aug 21, 2009 at 8:08 AM
- nipplehead
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,963
Originally posted by SolRebe1:
USC and the rest of the Pac-10 get noooo love.
It's true. I go to school on the East Coast and it's like the Pac-10 is a I-AA conference. Such a joke. Nevermind that SC crushes all nonconference opponents and the Pac went 5-0 in bowls last year...pisses me off.
Anyways, looking at our schedule this year, we have some tough games.
Cal, Oregon, Ohio State, and ND are ALL on the road. That's pretty f**king rough. We can handle it, though.
Armstead is out 6 weeks though with an injury to his ankle
Aug 21, 2009 at 10:02 AM
- Tracy49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,296
last 2 scrimmages Mitch has been lighting it up!
Aug 21, 2009 at 10:12 AM
- TX9R
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,348
Originally posted by SolRebe1:
USC and the rest of the Pac-10 get noooo love.
USC gets plenty of love. The reason the rest of the pac10 doesn't is because take way USC and you have a conference no better than the MAC. The 5-0 in bowls means nothing. USC being so good actually hurts the conference because anyone decent will go there, or to another school in a better conference.
Aug 21, 2009 at 2:35 PM
- SunDevilNiner79
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 54,091
Originally posted by TX9R:Originally posted by SolRebe1:
USC and the rest of the Pac-10 get noooo love.
USC gets plenty of love. The reason the rest of the pac10 doesn't is because take way USC and you have a conference no better than the MAC. The 5-0 in bowls means nothing. USC being so good actually hurts the conference because anyone decent will go there, or to another school in a better conference.
Removed your head from your [blank]
Aug 21, 2009 at 2:54 PM
- nipplehead
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,963
Yeah, that was a silly comment.
Aug 21, 2009 at 3:22 PM
- Hollywood49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,287
Originally posted by TX9R:Originally posted by SolRebe1:
USC and the rest of the Pac-10 get noooo love.
USC gets plenty of love. The reason the rest of the pac10 doesn't is because take way USC and you have a conference no better than the MAC. The 5-0 in bowls means nothing. USC being so good actually hurts the conference because anyone decent will go there, or to another school in a better conference.
The Mac really. When the Big 12 decides to win a big game without Vince Young Let us know.
Aug 21, 2009 at 3:23 PM
- pantstickle
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 3,467
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:Originally posted by TX9R:Originally posted by SolRebe1:
USC and the rest of the Pac-10 get noooo love.
USC gets plenty of love. The reason the rest of the pac10 doesn't is because take way USC and you have a conference no better than the MAC. The 5-0 in bowls means nothing. USC being so good actually hurts the conference because anyone decent will go there, or to another school in a better conference.
Don't put Oklahoma's losses on the entire Big 12.
Aug 21, 2009 at 4:24 PM
- SunDevilNiner79
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 54,091
Originally posted by pantstickle:Originally posted by Hollywood49er:Originally posted by TX9R:Originally posted by SolRebe1:
USC and the rest of the Pac-10 get noooo love.
USC gets plenty of love. The reason the rest of the pac10 doesn't is because take way USC and you have a conference no better than the MAC. The 5-0 in bowls means nothing. USC being so good actually hurts the conference because anyone decent will go there, or to another school in a better conference.
Don't put Oklahoma's losses on the entire Big 12.
Why not? What other conference do we put their losses on....
Aug 21, 2009 at 4:41 PM
- pantstickle
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 3,467
Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:Originally posted by pantstickle:Originally posted by Hollywood49er:Originally posted by TX9R:Originally posted by SolRebe1:
USC and the rest of the Pac-10 get noooo love.
USC gets plenty of love. The reason the rest of the pac10 doesn't is because take way USC and you have a conference no better than the MAC. The 5-0 in bowls means nothing. USC being so good actually hurts the conference because anyone decent will go there, or to another school in a better conference.
Don't put Oklahoma's losses on the entire Big 12.
Why not? What other conference do we put their losses on....
You could put them on Oklahoma.
Texas hasn't lost a bowl game since the 03 season.