There are 524 users in the forums

49ers sign LB De'Vondre Campbell

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Washed
Originally posted by ninersrule4:
Washed

You want the Jimmy G or Steve Wilks thread
I'd rather have him then Kendricks. Campbell is still a stud and Kendricks used to be. Great one year deal until Greenlaw comes back or one of the young bucks step up.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by BYisGod:
Washed up, but hey, we need bodies and he's a known commodity who brings leadership. Can't complain about this signing.

Seems to have fallen off in the past few seasons. I'm guessing he is plan B in case Winters/Graham don't step it up next season.

Not washed up and not plan B
Originally posted by jimrat:
Signing all these old fogies

Not really thaaaat old. Kendricks is 32 and people were jocking. This guy is 30. All pro more recently than Kendricks as well. He did us a favor by going to Dallas.
Originally posted by pd24:
Originally posted by Wrathman:
Is he better than Burks? Burks is slow and can't cover anything.

He is better, but let's hope Winters beats him out and this guy is a backup

That would mean Winters is a beast. Campbell is no joke.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
I don't think that's as good as Kendricks. But I like some depth there and not leaving the position with a huge hole.

You know nothing per usual
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,072
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,072
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,072
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue

I'm not the one assuming that Campbell gets taken off the field. You're the one saying he's a run stuffer and would get taken off the field in passing downs. Just scroll up and you'll see your post.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
coverage wise he is worse than both Burks or Kendricks

Can't be much worse than Burks allowing 8 or 9 receptions in the SB

He's probably more of a run down backer and will get taken off the field in nickel packages.

So you have him slotted as the 3rd LBer? Because the top two stay on the field in nickel.

You don't necessarily have to have two linebackers out there. You could have another safety playing down in the box in the linebacker spot. Or just a better coverage linebacker. Maybe one of the young guys steps up and fills that coverage roll.

Well that's what most teams do in nickel, use two LBs. You have no clue if Sorensen will use a third safety in his nickel package. I wouldn't assume that since it's unorthodox.

Im not telling you what's going to happen. I was answering your question which you tried to set me up for an argument. You have no clue either. So get a clue

I'm not the one assuming that Campbell gets taken off the field. You're the one saying he's a run stuffer and would get taken off the field in passing downs. Just scroll up and you'll see your post.

Yeah I think he may get taken off the field on 3rd downs but who knows. You're assuming that means I think he's the 3rd linebacker. I never said that either. If he's in there on base downs that would mean I think he's LB number 2. He doesn't have to be in there every down to stay LB number 2. Formations change personnel change on down to down bases. Some downs he could be LB 2 some he could be LB 3. Come on you're better than this.
Share 49ersWebzone