Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
I'm expecting $60M a year but $50M a year would be great.
There are 485 users in the forums
Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
I'm expecting $60M a year but $50M a year would be great.
Originally posted by Crown:
would you take less money so your company could be more productive?
I wouldn't.
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
I'm expecting $60M a year but $50M a year would be great.
would you take less money so your company could be more productive?
I wouldn't.
"You can't throw that ball any better. I'm not sure [Marcus] Jones can defend it any better. That's just a ridiculous throw and an unbelievable catch." — Greg Olsen pic.twitter.com/Uud8NtHd8L
— Coach Yac 🗣 (@Coach_Yac) February 16, 2025
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
I'm expecting $60M a year but $50M a year would be great.
would you take less money so your company could be more productive?
I wouldn't.
No. But my reputation/legacy/later opportunities for higher future pay hardly depend on my company's production so…
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
I'm expecting $60M a year but $50M a year would be great.
would you take less money so your company could be more productive?
I wouldn't.
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Brady took less money so his team could be great. Now he's a 7 time superbowl champion, makes more money through endorsements, has a huge contract as an announcer, and probably gets paid top dollar everytime someone wants to use his name/image.
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
I'm expecting $60M a year but $50M a year would be great.
would you take less money so your company could be more productive?
I wouldn't.
No. But my reputation/legacy/later opportunities for higher future pay hardly depend on my company's production so…
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
I'm expecting $60M a year but $50M a year would be great.
would you take less money so your company could be more productive?
I wouldn't.
No. But my reputation/legacy/later opportunities for higher future pay hardly depend on my company's production so…
At some point the money is so large that the differences to comfortable living for yourself, your family and your heirs becomes negligible. Is $50m vs. $60m a year that difference? Who knows. He just needs to take one $50m year and put it into financial plan that allows them to live off the interest and he's golden for life. I certainly wouldn't be splitting hairs over this difference myself in his shoes, but that's me.
Another factor to consider is that he also makes money off of endorsements. The more team success he has, the more likely he is to get endorsement deals. If taking a little less money on this contract allows him a better chance to win and get extensions and endorsements after this contract ends sacrificing $10m a year now could be worth $100m+ down the road. Everyone has to weigh these things out.
Long story short, there's viable arguments for both getting everything you can when you can, or for taking a little less in order to potentially add for more over time with subsequent deals that benefit from being able to afford more quality talent on the team around you.
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
Pay the man. Shanahan and Lynch would be on other teams right now if it werent for Purdy.
This NFL is a very "what have you done for me lately" league. Meaning year in and year out you have to produce. That's why I'll never understand the @Cantguardmike hate.
— JP5 (@JabrillPeppers) July 17, 2020
Originally posted by Crown:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by tohara3:
Sure hope Brock takes a little less so that we can get more playmakers on this team for him on both sides of the ball
I'm expecting $60M a year but $50M a year would be great.
would you take less money so your company could be more productive?
I wouldn't.