What Players Will Not Be on the Roster Next Season?

Originally posted by Lott94:

[b]

Originally posted by flynhayn15:

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Sanders? You don't give up a 3rd for a half season rental. He will be a 49er next season.

If Taylor and Hurd were healthy this season, I doubt we would have traded for him. The fact that Shanahan went into the SB with 4 WRs suited up and the fact that his offense was humming while only targeting 3 per game for most of the season tells you all you need to know about the value of WRs in his offense. Having a Julio type is something he is missing, but Sanders is not that. If both side can agree on compensation he will be back, but if not, they can let him walk, despite what they gave up for him. Not to mention, they will get a 3rd or a 4th back if someone else is willing to pay him more than we are, so we don't have to overpay to make the deal worth it.

I believe with comp picks, it depends on number of players signed and number of players lost.

Originally posted by flynhayn15:

If Taylor and Hurd were healthy this season, I doubt we would have traded for him. The fact that Shanahan went into the SB with 4 WRs suited up and the fact that his offense was humming while only targeting 3 per game for most of the season tells you all you need to know about the value of WRs in his offense. Having a Julio type is something he is missing, but Sanders is not that. If both side can agree on compensation he will be back, but if not, they can let him walk, despite what they gave up for him. Not to mention, they will get a 3rd or a 4th back if someone else is willing to pay him more than we are, so we don't have to overpay to make the deal worth it.

Originally posted by raywm3:

Can someone explain to me how we went from being one of the best cap situation teams to one of the worst, when we have purposely structured the deals to help with cap space?

Originally posted by tjd808185:

Originally posted by flynhayn15:
If Taylor and Hurd were healthy this season, I doubt we would have traded for him. The fact that Shanahan went into the SB with 4 WRs suited up and the fact that his offense was humming while only targeting 3 per game for most of the season tells you all you need to know about the value of WRs in his offense. Having a Julio type is something he is missing, but Sanders is not that. If both side can agree on compensation he will be back, but if not, they can let him walk, despite what they gave up for him. Not to mention, they will get a 3rd or a 4th back if someone else is willing to pay him more than we are, so we don't have to overpay to make the deal worth it.

We traded for Sanders because Pettis/ Goodwin flopped. Hurd and Taylor could never fill the Desean Jackson role in Shanny's offense. You need vertical threats. I'd put Sanders returning at 50/50. They may go to the draft but with limited picks even that's tough. Not sure how we can go back to Pettis after we neutered him this past year.

Originally posted by tjd808185:

Originally posted by raywm3:
Can someone explain to me how we went from being one of the best cap situation teams to one of the worst, when we have purposely structured the deals to help with cap space?

Because we have by far and away the most young talent in the league. You got to pay them eventually.

Originally posted by flynhayn15:

Pettis wasn't in the dog house until after the Seattle game, Sanders played in the 2 games before that. Goodwin didn't miss a start until the Sanders trade, and then came back for the Seattle, Arizona, and Baltimore games before he was put on IR.

Originally posted by mayo49:
The only one that I think won't be back is McKinnon - he's been stealing enough money.

Originally posted by LVJay:

Originally posted by mayo49:
The only one that I think won't be back is McKinnon - he's been stealing enough money.

That greedy lil thief can go squat 600 pounds on another team