Originally posted by Niner4ever:
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by Afrikan:
I didn't want to bring this up in the Jeff Wilson thread because I like the guy.. but just asking this question..
If Kyle is determined to get Coleman back on the field...and they deactivate Wilson to do so...couldn't Hurd be our Goal Line back, worse case scenario? Dude would be our biggest player and he's played RB. You could also motion him out wide and run it Juice or throw a fade/slant to Hurd.
I personally think they should find a way to trade Coleman and his contract.
I'd rather go with Samuel/Pettis/Goodwin/Hurd/James to keep Wilson active. I'm not sure who else will be deactivated, but Bourne is definitely one. Who were the inactives in the first three games?
**I just checked. Maybe deactivate Bourne and Day. We've really got to work out a trade for one or two of those guys.*
3 guys that need to be moved are Coleman, Goodwin, and McKinnon. They all have younger guys that can or have replaced them and are better.
Coleman is the best receiving back on them all. Please do not judge him off of
1 game. Or even 1 game and preseason.
I don't think we can move McKinnon. Who would take him + the contract? Plus, he's on IR. The best case scenario is that he balls in preseason (KS should really play McKinnon 50% of the time in preseason next year), and perhaps then we can net something higher than a 7th for him.
And why on earth would we move Goodwin? Have you forgotten what he can do? None of the younger guys can do what he does. Not a single one of them. Goodwin is in the perfect position once Samuel fully comes on. Pettis and Samuel as the starters, with Goodwin as our number 3 would be lethal.