Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by Giedi:

Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:

Originally posted by 24karat49er:

AM I GOING TO REGRET STARTING JIMMY IN FANTASY THIS WEEK OVER RUSSELL WILSON?

What are some honest predictions for him this week. Im expecting 250 passing yards and 2 td's with a prayer he throws no picks.

DO IT!!!... Jimmy never had a bad back-to-back bad game. As a matter of fact, he usually dominates after a bad game.

I'll buy what you are selling!

yea i expect him to get the ball out fast to his running backs and yard after catch specialists (kittle, deebo, james) goodwin might catch the defense slippin on a deep ball and pettis will have 5 catches. All the fantasy sites are saying to sit Garoppolo and Wilson but i like jimmy vs cincy than wilson in heinz field against an angry steeler team. Wish me luck yal.

Originally posted by BOI49er:

If Lynch says Jimmy is our quarterback "for now" to the press, he is trying to motivate him.

But he didn't actually say "for now", this is what he said.

But, he is our quarterback right now, and we're very happy that that's the case."

Big difference.

Originally posted by BOI49er:
If Lynch says Jimmy is our quarterback "for now" to the press, he is trying to motivate him.

I don't think he would say that publicly iif he felt nothing was being left on the table already.

Jimmy is not playing like a $137m quarterback.

lack of effort

Yes exactly. Very, very telling that a GM has to motivate their franchise QB that got paid like a top 3 QB when he signed that contract. Like I said you will never have to say those things about a rookie like Kyler Murray which Jimmy should be ashamed he's not trying to be the best. Some Niner fans just don't see the obvious though. Glad the national media is seeing it and talking about it too. Maybe that'll motivate the dude to work his butt off and take things more seriously.

Originally posted by John_Candy:
But he didn't actually say "for now", this is what he said.

Big difference.

It's essentially and contextually the same thing, just less blunt. If he said "Jimmy is our QB" then that would have been different. Using the word "now" is not a good look.

Originally posted by awp8912:

It's essentially and contextually the same thing, just less blunt. If he said "Jimmy is our QB" then that would have been different. Using the word "now" is not a good look.

No it's not. Saying "for now" means a QB change is imminent.

"I think those are other people's opinions," Lynch said Thursday on 95.7 The Game's "Joe, Lo & Dibs" show. "I can tell you, we do think really highly of Nick Mullens. We think very highly of C.J. Beathard, as well. But we've got a lot of belief in Jimmy Garoppolo, and Jimmy's our quarterback."

Originally posted by Giedi:

Originally posted by BOI49er:

If Lynch says Jimmy is our quarterback "for now" to the press, he is trying to motivate him.

I don't think he would say that publicly iif he felt nothing was being left on the table already.

Jimmy is not playing like a $137m quarterback.

We fans are not in a position to know if that is just rust, knee worries, lack of effort, or just inexperience, and all of our opinions on that are just speculation. Kyle and John Do have a better idea. Kyle did not look pleased with his quarterback last week on the sideline.

Nick Mullins is cruising, making good reads, decisions, and accurate throws.

Consensus of this board to the contrary, I do not think Silver's statement that we may see Mullens sooner than we might expect came exclusively out of his a$$.

You do not want to pull Jimmy too soon, because if Nick then gives you no reason to pull him, and I think Kyle thinks that may well be the case, it will be very hard to pull him for then a still unproven Jimmy, and Jimmy is way overpaid for the backup roll, and that means we deal him in the off season and take advantage of this "out" window in his contract.

Kyle and John are not at all happy with their record to date, and they've both repeatedly said it"s time to win now. I think they think they can make a run This Year in the post season. I think they are very antsy not to drop this game in Cincinnati or any games in the near future for not playing the guy that gives them the best chance to win Now. IF there is no improvement in Jimmy's play, we ain't going no two months playing him.

We play the same defense as Seattle. Cincinnati is going to be a tough offense to stop, especially if we back off of Bosa's pitch count, so we are going to need a pretty good score to win this game.

In My Opinion, Jimmy does not give us the best chance to win Today.

Fan's bias is that their quarterback is the essential ingredient and the reason you win. Coach's bias is that They are the reason you win. Especially if they are innovative geniuses that scheme people open. Kyle is not happy when he does that with a series of plays to set up the defense, and his quarterback does not read the defense properly and never sees the guy running free for the long touchdown. Jimmy did this, and I think Kyle thinks Nick would not have.

I don't know what is going to happen, but either way, it will not surprise me. And either way, I will support Kyle's decision, as I believe he has the information to make the best decision, and we do not.

Well if Jimmy starts in the cinci game, doesn't that mean Kyle thinks Jimmy *is* his franchise QB. That kind of goes against your opinion.

No, and no.

I hope Jimmy lights it up tomorrow to shut all the weirdo fans up who doubting him. Thats our Quarteback somebody bring that T.o meme with the sunglasses "THATS MY QUARTER BACK" beside the pick 6 and missing goodwin on that crossing route even tho goodwin should have caught the pass but he coulda been led better. Jimmy had a decent game 2 touchdowns called back, a clutch first down run in the 4th quarter called back, that deep ball to kendrick bourne was it over thrown or is Bourne just too slow and has no business running a go route? Bet Goodwin or James would have caught up to that ball n even if they couldnt so what Aaron rodgers and Tom Brady have overthrown their receivers too. Not to mention Kyle didnt let Dante play we kno dante can make plays thats like bringing ur weapon to a shootout and keeping it in your holster. The team needs to get better as a whole no penalties will make us a great team. Jimmy needs to cool it with the ignorant throws like that pick 6 and he has to lead his receivers a lil better hes not far off. I hope he proves my point tomorrow. 265 yards 2 Td's no interceptions in a "i got my mojo back" game. He gon be just a lil better than a game manager tomorrow and lead us to a win (THE STAT THAT MATTERS MOST).

Originally posted by John_Candy:

Originally posted by BOI49er:

If Lynch says Jimmy is our quarterback "for now" to the press, he is trying to motivate him.

But he didn't actually say "for now", this is what he said.

But, he is our quarterback right now, and we're very happy that that's the case."

Big difference.

That's a distinction without a difference. Both open the door for the future.

Originally posted by BOI49er:

That's a distinction without a difference. Both open the door for the future.

https://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/dictionary/american/for-now

for a short time, until a situation changes

https://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/dictionary/american/right-now

at the present time

Not the same. I'm posting on WZ right now. If I were posting on WZ "for now", it would mean that I'm leaving the site at some point. See the difference?

Originally posted by John_Candy:

Originally posted by BOI49er:

That's a distinction without a difference. Both open the door for the future.

https://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/dictionary/american/for-now

for a short time, until a situation changes

https://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/dictionary/american/right-now

at the present time

Not the same. I'm posting on WZ right now. If I were posting on WZ "for now", it would mean that I'm leaving the site at some point. See the difference?

No., You are posting on the web "right now" as opposed to taking a leak "right now". Not what Lynch meant.

I gotta go.

Originally posted by BOI49er:

No., You are posting on the web "right now" as opposed to taking a leak "right now". Not what Lynch meant.

Not really though.

All of this b******t is hilarious This thread is just losing its It-factor and at this current time just doesn't have the dog in it.

Originally posted by Jeepzilla:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Jimmy went 5-0 with an "expansion team" LMAO

No

Yes

Chip Kelly, offense full of starters that can barely make other teams (some aren't on a team lol), and a defense ranked dead last is expansion level.

That's not what Jimmy was working with.

Jimmy "worked with" a 1-10 roster, that started 0-9 that season, worst since the late 70s I believe, a first time GM and HC, a roster that was blown up from the previous year that was also decimated with injuries, and his targets were a trackstar and nothing more, a short white guy, an undrafted rookie, Louis Murphy, Celek Time (was never a thing before Jimmy), George Kittle who was still coming into his own, and Juice (thought of as an overpaid and terrible signing before Jimmy). Oh and by the way? That "talented team" that Jimmy is so privileged to be working with? is 4-20 since 2017, Jimmys 7 wins with the 49ers nearly double what Shanahan and this roster has "accomplished" in three seasons, and he's only played NINE GAMES

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Jimmy "worked with" a 1-10 roster, that started 0-9 that season, worst since the late 70s I believe, a first time GM and HC, a roster that was blown up from the previous year that was also decimated with injuries, and his targets were a trackstar and nothing more, a short white guy, an undrafted rookie, Louis Murphy, Celek Time (was never a thing before Jimmy), George Kittle who was still coming into his own, and Juice (thought of as an overpaid and terrible signing before Jimmy). Oh and by the way? That "talented team" that Jimmy is so privileged to be working with? is 4-20 since 2017, Jimmys 7 wins with the 49ers nearly double what Shanahan and this roster has "accomplished" in three seasons, and he's only played NINE GAMES

I get what you're saying and I don't deny Jimmy played great in 2017, but we just weren't expansion level anymore. We had NFL coaches, we had a WR that could stretch the field, we had a really good slot guy that would get open every 3rd down it seemed, and a TE that was set to break the NFL yardage record.

The 2017 team was 1-10 because Shanny tried to use expansion level QBs (Hoyer, Beathard). The roster, and offensive weapons in particular, were completely different from 2016. There were no Shaun Draugns, or Chris Harpers, or Dujuan Harris's. Kerley wasn't our best option. If 2017 was expansion level, the numbers Kap put up with the 2016 team are pretty impressive.

I'm curious, what's your point of this post?
Are you trying to somehow loop a point back to Kap and say he did better, is better, would be better, should have him right now over Jimmy G?

I'm really hoping that your not trying to make that silly argument.

That will not be allowed in this thread. CK has his own thread. That stuff needs to go in there.

If anyone doesn't know where it is, do a search in the Parking Lot.

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by Jeepzilla:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Jimmy went 5-0 with an "expansion team" LMAO

No

Yes

Chip Kelly, offense full of starters that can barely make other teams (some aren't on a team lol), and a defense ranked dead last is expansion level.

That's not what Jimmy was working with.

Jimmy "worked with" a 1-10 roster, that started 0-9 that season, worst since the late 70s I believe, a first time GM and HC, a roster that was blown up from the previous year that was also decimated with injuries, and his targets were a trackstar and nothing more, a short white guy, an undrafted rookie, Louis Murphy, Celek Time (was never a thing before Jimmy), George Kittle who was still coming into his own, and Juice (thought of as an overpaid and terrible signing before Jimmy). Oh and by the way? That "talented team" that Jimmy is so privileged to be working with? is 4-20 since 2017, Jimmys 7 wins with the 49ers nearly double what Shanahan and this roster has "accomplished" in three seasons, and he's only played NINE GAMES

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Jimmy "worked with" a 1-10 roster, that started 0-9 that season, worst since the late 70s I believe, a first time GM and HC, a roster that was blown up from the previous year that was also decimated with injuries, and his targets were a trackstar and nothing more, a short white guy, an undrafted rookie, Louis Murphy, Celek Time (was never a thing before Jimmy), George Kittle who was still coming into his own, and Juice (thought of as an overpaid and terrible signing before Jimmy). Oh and by the way? That "talented team" that Jimmy is so privileged to be working with? is 4-20 since 2017, Jimmys 7 wins with the 49ers nearly double what Shanahan and this roster has "accomplished" in three seasons, and he's only played NINE GAMES

I get what you're saying and I don't deny Jimmy played great in 2017, but we just weren't expansion level anymore. We had NFL coaches, we had a WR that could stretch the field, we had a really good slot guy that would get open every 3rd down it seemed, and a TE that was set to break the NFL yardage record.

The 2017 team was 1-10 because Shanny tried to use expansion level QBs (Hoyer, Beathard). The roster, and offensive weapons in particular, were completely different from 2016. There were no Shaun Draugns, or Chris Harpers, or Dujuan Harris's. Kerley wasn't our best option. If 2017 was expansion level, the numbers Kap put up with the 2016 team are pretty impressive.

I'm curious, what's your point of this post?
Are you trying to somehow loop a point back to Kap and say he did better, is better, would be better, should have him right now over Jimmy G?

I'm really hoping that your not trying to make that silly argument.

That will not be allowed in this thread. CK has his own thread. That stuff needs to go in there.

If anyone doesn't know where it is, do a search in the Parking Lot.

Thanks Dj. Needed to be said...again.

Originally posted by pasodoc9er:

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by Jeepzilla:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Jimmy went 5-0 with an "expansion team" LMAO

No

Yes

Chip Kelly, offense full of starters that can barely make other teams (some aren't on a team lol), and a defense ranked dead last is expansion level.

That's not what Jimmy was working with.

Jimmy "worked with" a 1-10 roster, that started 0-9 that season, worst since the late 70s I believe, a first time GM and HC, a roster that was blown up from the previous year that was also decimated with injuries, and his targets were a trackstar and nothing more, a short white guy, an undrafted rookie, Louis Murphy, Celek Time (was never a thing before Jimmy), George Kittle who was still coming into his own, and Juice (thought of as an overpaid and terrible signing before Jimmy). Oh and by the way? That "talented team" that Jimmy is so privileged to be working with? is 4-20 since 2017, Jimmys 7 wins with the 49ers nearly double what Shanahan and this roster has "accomplished" in three seasons, and he's only played NINE GAMES

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Jimmy "worked with" a 1-10 roster, that started 0-9 that season, worst since the late 70s I believe, a first time GM and HC, a roster that was blown up from the previous year that was also decimated with injuries, and his targets were a trackstar and nothing more, a short white guy, an undrafted rookie, Louis Murphy, Celek Time (was never a thing before Jimmy), George Kittle who was still coming into his own, and Juice (thought of as an overpaid and terrible signing before Jimmy). Oh and by the way? That "talented team" that Jimmy is so privileged to be working with? is 4-20 since 2017, Jimmys 7 wins with the 49ers nearly double what Shanahan and this roster has "accomplished" in three seasons, and he's only played NINE GAMES

I get what you're saying and I don't deny Jimmy played great in 2017, but we just weren't expansion level anymore. We had NFL coaches, we had a WR that could stretch the field, we had a really good slot guy that would get open every 3rd down it seemed, and a TE that was set to break the NFL yardage record.

The 2017 team was 1-10 because Shanny tried to use expansion level QBs (Hoyer, Beathard). The roster, and offensive weapons in particular, were completely different from 2016. There were no Shaun Draugns, or Chris Harpers, or Dujuan Harris's. Kerley wasn't our best option. If 2017 was expansion level, the numbers Kap put up with the 2016 team are pretty impressive.

I'm curious, what's your point of this post?
Are you trying to somehow loop a point back to Kap and say he did better, is better, would be better, should have him right now over Jimmy G?

I'm really hoping that your not trying to make that silly argument.

That will not be allowed in this thread. CK has his own thread. That stuff needs to go in there.

If anyone doesn't know where it is, do a search in the Parking Lot.

Thanks Dj. Needed to be said...again.

Well can someone argue Alex Smith is better then Jimmy G here then?