Originally posted by Memphis9er:Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:While Thomas hasn't produced as the team has hoped I just can't call him a bust, or even blame him for it. For starters, the main problem is that we should have never drafted him in the first place. To be sure, I think he WAS worth a top 5 pick. But WE should not have drafted him. Since the day he was drafted I have been saying that we DID NOT need another interior D-linemen drafted in the 1st round. That was a poor use of draft resources as that position was - and still is - a position of strength for us.
But to compound the poor choice of draft capital was the reason we drafted him. We drafted Thomas to be an EDGE rusher - the LEO - when there was NOTHING in his playing time at Stanford that would suggest that he would remotely be successful as an EDGE rusher, in any scheme in the NFL. This point is reinforced whenever Thomas is played on the inside he's pretty dominant.
So yes, he IS being played out of position!! That is painfully clear. I get so frustrated whenever I see him put on the edge only to see him get stonewalled or little pressure. But I cannot put too much blame on him as the man was mis-drafted and mal-purposed. As I said then, if you need an edge rusher you draft an edge rusher, or sign one off the street, or mark that to the game if neither opportunity presents itself. You don't "force a square peg in a round hole" by trying to shoehorn a player into a position that don't suite his abilities. As a coach myself I can tell you that's coaching 101. But that's what we did with Thomas, and predictably it hasn't worked out, nor will it.
People need to understand that while Thomas has disappointed he wasn't exactly put into the best position to succeed as a 49ers. And that's a real shame because he's supremely talented as an interior D-linemen. Thomas is a supreme, shinning example of why YOU DON'T DRAFT BEST PLAYER AVAILABLE!!!! Bottom line, Thomas should have never been drafted by us. We should have traded out of that pick. Now, we've wasted years trying to develop him into a player he never had the natural ability for, and we STILL had to spend another high top on a real EDGE rusher.
So I won't label him a bust and I think it's unfair for fans to label him a bust as well.
Solomon hasn't looked dominant in the NFL at any position. It was a pick that should've never happened. We already had plenty of defensive linemen. He got picked because our rookie GM liked him on a personal level. He never showed anything special to make me think he was anything special. He was an undersized interior lineman winning in college due to superior physical ability, not technique. We didn't need him then, and judging by his snap count last week, we still don't. I'm all for him playing inside on nickle just to see if hes any good at all when hes just cut loose on the quarterback. To my recollection, hes only had one decent game for us, and that was against the redskins. Our only hope for him is that he's one of those slow developers like Armstead, who really didn't contribute much his first couple of years.
You need to stop this crap. You honestly think a new GM/HC would select a player 2/3 overall because they like him personally but don't think that he's super talented?
You didn't like him...who are you? Virtually every draft person who covers it for a living had Thomas in their top 5. You won't find a grade lower than a B+ for our round 1 grades that year and the only ones that didn't give an A were concerned about Foster not Thomas.
49ers weren't the only team who liked Thomas. So let's not make chit up and change history.