I'd rather our QB be developed by a guy who played the game but whoever we use, he needs to be good and needs to be here for a while. If it's Chip then I don't want to see him canned in a year.
[ Edited by Blindfury on Nov 23, 2016 at 11:28 AM ]
There are 267 users in the forums
If the 49ers were to draft/sign a QB in the offseason. Who would develop him?
Nov 23, 2016 at 11:27 AM
- Blindfury
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,663
Himself. Apparently the QB is the only one responsible for development. At least that was what I've been told here.
I'd rather our QB be developed by a guy who played the game but whoever we use, he needs to be good and needs to be here for a while. If it's Chip then I don't want to see him canned in a year.
I'd rather our QB be developed by a guy who played the game but whoever we use, he needs to be good and needs to be here for a while. If it's Chip then I don't want to see him canned in a year.
Nov 23, 2016 at 12:44 PM
- fan49
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,254
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Kense:
There is no point at all in drafting a QB higher than round 3. They need to build the Defense first. There are no QB's coming out in the draft that are impressive.
There is almost no sense in drafting a QB lower than round 2. I wish people would learn how few QBs drafted after the 2nd round amount to anything. There are so few examples in NFL history, yet people are always advocating us trying to find a gem late in the draft. It is mind boggling.
good point if there is a qb worthy of are 2nd pick. and there is not
Nov 23, 2016 at 1:17 PM
- Kense
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,350
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
There is almost no sense in drafting a QB lower than round 2. I wish people would learn how few QBs drafted after the 2nd round amount to anything. There are so few examples in NFL history, yet people are always advocating us trying to find a gem late in the draft. It is mind boggling.
All QB's are a question mark, ALL of them. Even high draft picks. How many actually work out. It's rare no matter where they are taken. If the team around them sucks like most high draft picks they will pretty much suck as well and be damaged goods. There is nobody in this draft that I would consider a 1rst round QB . Maybe late 2nd rounder at best.
[ Edited by Kense on Nov 23, 2016 at 1:18 PM ]
Nov 28, 2016 at 9:57 AM
- glorydayz
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,455
Originally posted by Kense:This is why we need a coach that can develope QB's. These guys are not always ready to come in and play right away.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
There is almost no sense in drafting a QB lower than round 2. I wish people would learn how few QBs drafted after the 2nd round amount to anything. There are so few examples in NFL history, yet people are always advocating us trying to find a gem late in the draft. It is mind boggling.
All QB's are a question mark, ALL of them. Even high draft picks. How many actually work out. It's rare no matter where they are taken. If the team around them sucks like most high draft picks they will pretty much suck as well and be damaged goods. There is nobody in this draft that I would consider a 1rst round QB . Maybe late 2nd rounder at best.
Nov 28, 2016 at 3:10 PM
- LasVegasWally
- Veteran
- Posts: 24,264
Find the best guy in or out of football and PAY him.
Dec 2, 2016 at 11:53 AM
- glorydayz
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,455
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Find the best guy in or out of football and PAY him.
Who would be the best guy?
Dec 3, 2016 at 1:05 AM
- LVJay
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,847
