Originally posted by NYniner85:
Brendel isn't as bad as fans think and he's isn't as good as Foerster thinks
To be fair he didn't say he was great just that he didn't screw up :)
There are 225 users in the forums
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Brendel isn't as bad as fans think and he's isn't as good as Foerster thinks
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Pleasants is getting alot of praise these OTA's. Many have said he looks amazing. And Burford has apparently slimmed down in the mid section and Mckivitz looks bigger in the upper body. Also Burford has been playing tackle these OTA's. All of a sudden the tackle depth doesn't look all too bad with Trent, Mckivitz, Pleasants, and Burford.
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Pleasants is getting alot of praise these OTA's. Many have said he looks amazing. And Burford has apparently slimmed down in the mid section and Mckivitz looks bigger in the upper body. Also Burford has been playing tackle these OTA's. All of a sudden the tackle depth doesn't look all too bad with Trent, Mckivitz, Pleasants, and Burford.
Originally posted by GorefullBore:
I thought this was a pretty fair and balanced take on the O-line group overall. It's not overly negative, and as they mention the health of the group will probably dictate how well the group does as a whole due to a lack of depth.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Pleasants is getting alot of praise these OTA's. Many have said he looks amazing. And Burford has apparently slimmed down in the mid section and Mckivitz looks bigger in the upper body. Also Burford has been playing tackle these OTA's. All of a sudden the tackle depth doesn't look all too bad with Trent, Mckivitz, Pleasants, and Burford.
I'd love to hear all the positive stuff about the OL but I also want to see what's happening once the pads come on in training camp and even more so when we practice/play vs other teams.
One downside of camp reports is when one side looks good...it usually means the other side doesn't.
Originally posted by Scoots:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Brendel isn't as bad as fans think and he's isn't as good as Foerster thinks
To be fair he didn't say he was great just that he didn't screw up :)
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Pleasants is getting alot of praise these OTA's. Many have said he looks amazing. And Burford has apparently slimmed down in the mid section and Mckivitz looks bigger in the upper body. Also Burford has been playing tackle these OTA's. All of a sudden the tackle depth doesn't look all too bad with Trent, Mckivitz, Pleasants, and Burford.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Pleasants is getting alot of praise these OTA's. Many have said he looks amazing. And Burford has apparently slimmed down in the mid section and Mckivitz looks bigger in the upper body. Also Burford has been playing tackle these OTA's. All of a sudden the tackle depth doesn't look all too bad with Trent, Mckivitz, Pleasants, and Burford.
I'd love to hear all the positive stuff about the OL but I also want to see what's happening once the pads come on in training camp and even more so when we practice/play vs other teams.
One downside of camp reports is when one side looks good...it usually means the other side doesn't.
Originally posted by TD49ers:
You clearly didnt read Forresters comments.
Originally posted by Scoots:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
You clearly didnt read Forresters comments.
I did, he said he graded out at the top but didn't say what those grades were composed of. It's a common thing for coaches to do to talk up players.
Originally posted by genus49:
I'd love to hear all the positive stuff about the OL but I also want to see what's happening once the pads come on in training camp and even more so when we practice/play vs other teams.
One downside of camp reports is when one side looks good...it usually means the other side doesn't.