Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
God why does the HOF folks hate our players
They hate quitters too. You think he deserves to be on the first ballot? Lol.
And does Calvin Johnson, who also "quit" too?
There are 212 users in the forums
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
God why does the HOF folks hate our players
They hate quitters too. You think he deserves to be on the first ballot? Lol.
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:Willis or Warner who you got, no injuries matter at all.
I'm going willis
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
God why does the HOF folks hate our players
They hate quitters too. You think he deserves to be on the first ballot? Lol.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:Willis or Warner who you got, no injuries matter at all.
I'm going willis
Really going out on a limb on that one
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
God why does the HOF folks hate our players
They hate quitters too. You think he deserves to be on the first ballot? Lol.
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
God why does the HOF folks hate our players
They hate quitters too. You think he deserves to be on the first ballot? Lol.
Remember, pd is a Steelers fan.
Originally posted by KittleMeThis:Warner hasn't gone into his prime yet.
LOL Cmon, this is goes without question. Willis > Warner no matter how you want to look at it.
I love Warner, but he's not Willis. He's not even a Bowman in his prime, but still a very good LB.
But Willis was special. Forever my favorite player.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Warner hasn't gone into his prime yet.
But if you compare both Warner's and Willis's first and second years, Warner is well on his way of matching and maybe even exceeding Willis's career.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by KittleMeThis:Warner hasn't gone into his prime yet.
LOL Cmon, this is goes without question. Willis > Warner no matter how you want to look at it.
I love Warner, but he's not Willis. He's not even a Bowman in his prime, but still a very good LB.
But Willis was special. Forever my favorite player.
But if you compare both Warner's and Willis's first and second years, Warner is well on his way of matching and maybe even exceeding Willis's career.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:the numbers are close and on top of that, Warner covers the best TE. nothing crazy about how good warner can be
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by KittleMeThis:Warner hasn't gone into his prime yet.
LOL Cmon, this is goes without question. Willis > Warner no matter how you want to look at it.
I love Warner, but he's not Willis. He's not even a Bowman in his prime, but still a very good LB.
But Willis was special. Forever my favorite player.
But if you compare both Warner's and Willis's first and second years, Warner is well on his way of matching and maybe even exceeding Willis's career.
This is the craziest post I've ever read from a guy with 50,000 posts.
Willis had 174 tackles his rookie year. 4 sacks 8 tfl 5 pd. For the #20 defense in points and #25 in yards.
GMAFB.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:the numbers are close and on top of that, Warner covers the best TE. nothing crazy about how good warner can be
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
the numbers are close and on top of that, Warner covers the best TE. nothing crazy about how good warner can be
86 is close to 174? Zero is close to four? Your taking crazy pills.