Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
I didn't like Bucko's performance last year but I would have kept him over AA, even though Buck got more money.
But then we wouldn't have Kinlaw. It's not Armstead over Buckner. It's Armstead/Kinlaw over Buckner.
Exactly. Also...we'd be DOA if we didn't have AA to play snaps at edge now.
ok, this just started a whole new AWESOME argument... love this kinda topic !!!
love you babyyy !!!
so here we go..
Really, we could have paid Bucko if we wanted to but we would have not signed Ward and got rid of some other players who we can afford to let go.
Obviously, we would have traded Armstead.
But the fact is, Bucko was a PROVEN commodity compare to AA and KINLAW... you all said it yourselves, BUCKO IS TOP 5 at his position..
Kinlaw, I'm not even going to give him a grade until after week 8th.. that's when you'll all here from me about this kid.
at worst, I would have put the TAG on Armstead... as much as I don't like the guy, he had an ALL PRO year last year... but I would have at least like to see if he can duplicate the performance..