Originally posted by valrod33:
He is good but he isnt asomugha/revis/woodson good.
No need to overpay him
I'm pretty sure he won't be OVER-PAID like some thought Brooks was, we got a genius behind the calculator.
There are 255 users in the forums
Originally posted by valrod33:
He is good but he isnt asomugha/revis/woodson good.
No need to overpay him
Originally posted by NickSh49:Grant Cohn needs to stop baiting the fans into this Mike Wallace hype.
Originally posted by qnnhan7:I hope Rogers signed with us. His veteran experience helps a lot last year, but he's not irreplaceable. I think it will be OK with T. Brown and Culliver. I know some people don't like Brown but he actually did pretty good, especially the second half of the season. Culliver I like too. I think he will be a very good one.
Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by valrod33:He is good but he isnt asomugha/revis/woodson good.
No need to overpay him
I'm pretty sure he won't be OVER-PAID like some thought Brooks was, we got a genius behind the calculator.
Originally posted by valrod33:
He is good but he isnt asomugha/revis/woodson good.
No need to overpay him
Originally posted by 5280High:
Originally posted by valrod33:
He is good but he isnt asomugha/revis/woodson good.
No need to overpay him
Asomugha isnt even asomugha good anymore in his new system. And Woodson is now more of a freelance CB/safety, than a pure cover guy. Fans need to keep in perspective Wallace's QB... Mr. Hold on to the ball break two tackles and launch it when DB's can't be expected to cover a guy that long.
With Alex as the QB, Rogers adds more to the team than Wallace... since the second a play breaks down Smith has the opposite tendencies of Big Ben. (Ie: checks down vs. looking for the homerun). If CK steps in after a year or two, then Wallace adds more value if CK plays similar to Ben. My vote goes to Rogers since its easier to envision his success and transition into a Woodson-like hybrid in the defense when DG leaves next year, then fully maximizing Wallace's upside for the cost it will take to get him here(1st round pick + new big contract).
Originally posted by swag49:
Rogers lost a lot of $ with that performance against Victor Cruz...just my opinion
Originally posted by swag49:
Rogers lost a lot of $ with that performance against Victor Cruz...just my opinion
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by swag49:
Rogers lost a lot of $ with that performance against Victor Cruz...just my opinion
please. you do not base a entire years performance on one bad half of football in one game. if we let rogers go it will have nothing to do with that game.
Originally posted by swag49:
Rogers lost a lot of $ with that performance against Victor Cruz...just my opinion
Originally posted by valrod33:
You must have missed the 2nd half of the game when Rogers made adjustments and shut him down