There are 338 users in the forums

New Principle Owner Jed York Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Denise Debartolo York = Cheap.
Dr. John York = Very, very Cheap.
Jed York = Overspend, reckless with money, win nothing, reigned back in by parents. Especially John who controls the checkbook.

Jed is setter of standards. he is CEO of 49ers Enterprises

- "Not everything 49ers CEO Jed York said to reporters at the NFL owners' meetings is worthy of disdain"

Mercury News (source)

Set the owner texting before each draft pick standard.
Cannot stand this dude or his parents
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Set the owner texting before each draft pick standard.

he's CEO and runs the socials that's 2 for one. I don't think Jerrah Jones has ever sent a tweet in his life
this is how jed should have reacted when the draft prospect kept calling him coach

Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by RDB4216:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by RDB4216:
Thanks, Jed! You saved me some money on NFL Sunday Ticket this year, and freed up my Sundays - because I won't be watching a single game this year!!!! I am sure cheap a@@ Mommy and Daddy are proud of you!

Pushing your luck here. Presumably you won't be needing to keep posting here?

Why don't you lok at the post I was replying to, maybe? Or is "attacks on others" just ok for the favorites here?
You really have to ask?

Well, Dale, check his defence. Did the post he responded to justified being told to f**k off? And as a response to the favourites BS, check out Rules 4 and 5.
Of course it didn't justify his F off comment even though I found the knee pad comment funny,but he was clearly incited by the casual comment which could be considered a personal attack which I thought was frowned upon?

And as far as the favorites go time & again any criticism valid or otherwise is repeatedly met with name calling from the same posters with nary a peep from the moderators.

Dale - notice how English said to look at rule 4 and 5? Ignoring rule 1, which says be respectful. But rule 5: "Infractions, warnings, and bannings are determined at the sole and absolute discretion of the moderating staff." He literally pointed out the rule that says the mods can play favorites, while trying to deny that they do - LOL!
Originally posted by RiceOwensStokes:
Cannot stand this dude or his parents

Lol
Originally posted by RDB4216:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by RDB4216:
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by RDB4216:
Thanks, Jed! You saved me some money on NFL Sunday Ticket this year, and freed up my Sundays - because I won't be watching a single game this year!!!! I am sure cheap a@@ Mommy and Daddy are proud of you!

Pushing your luck here. Presumably you won't be needing to keep posting here?

Why don't you lok at the post I was replying to, maybe? Or is "attacks on others" just ok for the favorites here?
You really have to ask?

Well, Dale, check his defence. Did the post he responded to justified being told to f**k off? And as a response to the favourites BS, check out Rules 4 and 5.
Of course it didn't justify his F off comment even though I found the knee pad comment funny,but he was clearly incited by the casual comment which could be considered a personal attack which I thought was frowned upon?

And as far as the favorites go time & again any criticism valid or otherwise is repeatedly met with name calling from the same posters with nary a peep from the moderators.

Dale - notice how English said to look at rule 4 and 5? Ignoring rule 1, which says be respectful. But rule 5: "Infractions, warnings, and bannings are determined at the sole and absolute discretion of the moderating staff." He literally pointed out the rule that says the mods can play favorites, while trying to deny that they do - LOL!

All made up in your own mind.
8.5 billion for 6% stake is bonkers

Edit whoopsie haven't had my coffee
[ Edited by Hoovtrain on May 15, 2025 at 9:19 AM ]
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
8.5 billion for 6% stake is bonkers

yeah if that was the case, which it isn't lol
8.5 bil is a valuation for the entire club. they are buying in at 6%, with a club valuation, at more than 8.5 bil. how much more, you tell me. if we assume 8.5 bil club valuation, 6% = $510m. so they are paying something >$510 m. you'd have to pay 8.5 bil for 100%, and even then, it's not for sale.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
8.5 billion for 6% stake is bonkers

yeah if that was the case, which it isn't lol

Wow this must be a new feeling for you to be right about something lol
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
8.5 billion for 6% stake is bonkers

Edit whoopsie haven't had my coffee

8.5 billion is the evaluation my guy... it's about a half a bill
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
8.5 billion for 6% stake is bonkers

yeah if that was the case, which it isn't lol

Wow this must be a new feeling for you to be right about something lol

what's new is you realizing you are wrong, aside from that, this is business as usual
Originally posted by NYniner85:

They need to fund Leeds United
Open Menu
Search Share 49ersWebzone