Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:Originally posted by darkknight49:Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by PopeyeJonesing:Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Crabtree was not impressive this year. That video showed he has about zero YAC ability.
Dude, are you like really, really serious?
Crabtree was Top 10 (#8) in the NFL this year for YAC/catch for receivers w/ >50 catches this year.
If you want to go down to 40 catches, he's Top 11, and Josh Morgan (now eligible w/ 44 catches) is top 3 in the NFL.
Vernon Davis was also #1 in the NFL for YAC/catch this year for TEs.
Basically, if you want to combine WRs and TEs and make the threshold 40 catches, we had three players in the top 15 in the NFL for YAC per catch this last season.*
I swear to god some of you don't even watch the games and just come here to senselessly complain.
*Which yes, is also Alex's fault.
EDIT: Stats here -- http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/stats/byposition?pos=WR&conference=NFL&year=season_2010&timeframe=All&sort=46&old_category=TE
pwn3d lol
Ah, yeah. This is basically the thread where I got schooled. It was in the MC Video Thread. However, I stand corrected. He was 8th in the league last year, not 7th. No matter how you slice it, 8th out of all WR is pretty legit. Look at some of the guys he's ahead of.
Ah, for receivers who have over 50 catches, Crabtree is ranked 7th - I was ranking for all WRs. However, for receivers who have at minimum 20 catches, Crabtree drops to 22nd. Interestingly enough, the top WRs do not have great YACs. For example, Roddy White only averages 3.3 YAC and he has a good QB throwing to him. Andre Johnson only averages 4 YAC.
The conclusion that I come to is that YAC is not necessarily a good measure of a WR's productivity. Sure, it's nice for a a WR to have a good YAC but it's not a premium measuring stick. Catches and yards/game is a more telling indication of how productive a WR is IMO.
-9fA
Most people who look at WR stats know that YAC is tremendously overrated.