Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Gore > R.Craig
Gore > G.Hearst
Gore> errbody
Gore > All
Get it right.
There are 220 users in the forums
Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Gore > R.Craig
Gore > G.Hearst
Gore> errbody
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
I know it sounds crazy but I just want to blow this thing up. Especially on offense. Arian Foster will be the first to 1.000 yards. I got nothing but good things to say about him but our entire offense is based on a 31 year old running back. Time is running out and it would serve him better to not be wasted here. Just like the OP mentioned.
It might work out better for both parties.
Originally posted by Youngone:
Frank is a great HB but really....I'm kinda getting tired of the offense being held hostage by Gore and trying to make him the centerpiece of everything the team wishes to accomplish. It hasn't worked in the past 4 years.
Originally posted by Wodwo:Originally posted by TonyStarks:
Gore > R.Craig
Gore > G.Hearst
Gore> errbody
Gore > All
Get it right.
Originally posted by TheGoldDiggerrrr:
Agree we need more talent around gore. R. Craig was amazing but we had guys like steve, joe, tom,jerry,clark, and many others around him to make them great and the coaching and the time which gore doesn't have.
Originally posted by bret:
I'm going to get roasted for this, but it needs to be said: Gore is a great runner and a true hard-nosed football player. He wasn't a good blocker when he joined the team, but through hard work he made himself into one of the best. I've loved watching him, and the yardage he makes against stacked boxes is amazing!
But sometimes there is a reason players don't ever get to play with a winner. This was brought up a couple years ago and no one believed; now it was brought up by a Bucs' player this week: Gore tips the plays.
Maybe that has something to do with why he has to run with the odds stacked so highly against him.
As good as Gore is, I'll take a Roger Craig any day. He was an outstanding runner, a good blocker, a great receiver, and HE WON!
Originally posted by Wodwo:Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
I know it sounds crazy but I just want to blow this thing up. Especially on offense. Arian Foster will be the first to 1.000 yards. I got nothing but good things to say about him but our entire offense is based on a 31 year old running back. Time is running out and it would serve him better to not be wasted here. Just like the OP mentioned.
It might work out better for both parties.
I can understand the frustration. It's a thing with fans, they get upset when their team loses and they have to blame somebody. This season I can see people blaming Gore because he's the "centerpiece" of the offense. It's frustrating as hell watching him run into a wall twice putting us in third and long.
Just take a second to think about how different it would be if he was used properly, though. Would you really want him gone if we brought in someone who could make him a part of the offense and not the whole of the offense? Even if he was on the field the whole time, if he wasn't the center of a failed scheme he would be an asset worth having, right?
We need to use all of our weapons equally. That's the fault of the coaching staff, not Frank Gore.
Where did you come up with the bold, though? I must have missed something. My brain is working even worse than normal today.
Originally posted by Wodwo:Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
I know it sounds crazy but I just want to blow this thing up. Especially on offense. Arian Foster will be the first to 1.000 yards. I got nothing but good things to say about him but our entire offense is based on a 31 year old running back. Time is running out and it would serve him better to not be wasted here. Just like the OP mentioned.
It might work out better for both parties.
I can understand the frustration. It's a thing with fans, they get upset when their team loses and they have to blame somebody. This season I can see people blaming Gore because he's the "centerpiece" of the offense. It's frustrating as hell watching him run into a wall twice putting us in third and long.
Just take a second to think about how different it would be if he was used properly, though. Would you really want him gone if we brought in someone who could make him a part of the offense and not the whole of the offense? Even if he was on the field the whole time, if he wasn't the center of a failed scheme he would be an asset worth having, right?
We need to use all of our weapons equally. That's the fault of the coaching staff, not Frank Gore.
Where did you come up with the bold, though? I must have missed something. My brain is working even worse than normal today.
Originally posted by susweel:Originally posted by bret:
I'm going to get roasted for this, but it needs to be said: Gore is a great runner and a true hard-nosed football player. He wasn't a good blocker when he joined the team, but through hard work he made himself into one of the best. I've loved watching him, and the yardage he makes against stacked boxes is amazing!
But sometimes there is a reason players don't ever get to play with a winner. This was brought up a couple years ago and no one believed; now it was brought up by a Bucs' player this week: Gore tips the plays.
Maybe that has something to do with why he has to run with the odds stacked so highly against him.
As good as Gore is, I'll take a Roger Craig any day. He was an outstanding runner, a good blocker, a great receiver, and HE WON!
I'd take Ricky Waters over both of those guys. To bad we had another idiot GM who did not resign him.
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
It's like dog years for running backs. He may be only 27 but it might as well be 31. It's well known that running backs only last 8 years in the NFL if they're lucky.
I'm not blaming Frank but I wouldn't mind some fresh ideas as well as fresh legs. There is no other option than Frank with this staff. Running games are not as essential as they used to be to win in today's NFL.
He's a great player but I'm tired of watching this movie.
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
Gore fits the scheme of this staff. Power running game.
Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:Originally posted by Wodwo:Originally posted by BETTERDAYZ9ERS:
I know it sounds crazy but I just want to blow this thing up. Especially on offense. Arian Foster will be the first to 1.000 yards. I got nothing but good things to say about him but our entire offense is based on a 31 year old running back. Time is running out and it would serve him better to not be wasted here. Just like the OP mentioned.
It might work out better for both parties.
I can understand the frustration. It's a thing with fans, they get upset when their team loses and they have to blame somebody. This season I can see people blaming Gore because he's the "centerpiece" of the offense. It's frustrating as hell watching him run into a wall twice putting us in third and long.
Just take a second to think about how different it would be if he was used properly, though. Would you really want him gone if we brought in someone who could make him a part of the offense and not the whole of the offense? Even if he was on the field the whole time, if he wasn't the center of a failed scheme he would be an asset worth having, right?
We need to use all of our weapons equally. That's the fault of the coaching staff, not Frank Gore.
Where did you come up with the bold, though? I must have missed something. My brain is working even worse than normal today.
Gore fits the scheme of this staff. Power running game.