Why do you keep harping on one point? Yes, he had decent success against some scrubs but does he have more inherent utility than some of the players we kept at this point in time?
We kept a few pass rushing OLBs, a safety but cut a RB. Is it me, or do I see a pattern? We kept players in positions where we have questions at, and we cut a bubble player in arguably, our most talented position on offense.
That being said, I don't know why our OTs and TEs are so thin, but we're talking about Sheets here.
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Originally posted by bigninerfan56:
Originally posted by glorydayz:
Originally posted by showtime49:
Originally posted by glorydayz:
We kept Briggs & Harris over Sheets, good by SM hello new GM next year!
This is almost comical, we could have the #1 pick again next year with this week talent evaluating that we are administering.
I'm pretty sure we need pass-rushing OLBs more than a 3rd/4th string running back.
Goodbye logic, hello overreaction time.
Again, I want Sheets and hopefully he'll make it to our PS. Nearly every team in the NFL passed him 7 times each. I don't know if a few solid plays would be enough to change their minds - there's a bunch of other RBs with good preseasons on the waiver wire too. Homer glasses might be blinding us.
That was before they saw him do his thing, I doubt he makes our PS.
Do what thing? Does he have potential? sure, but it's not like he was gaining 8 yards a carry. I think there is a very real chance he lands on our PS. Clayton has the last couple years.
Do what thing?
LOL where have you been?
