Originally posted by ninerfan818:
Originally posted by jones49:
Originally posted by Leathaface:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by jones49:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by ninerfan818:
Originally posted by Ceadderman:
Originally posted by 915Niner915:
dude ND is not ready to play against 1st string D's. Let the guy develop, let him stay in that 3rd role. I personally cant wait for the season to start IMO. Hill had like 13-8 TD/INT from half a season? Play the whole and double 26-16 and 3k + yrds? Idk lol
double his stats over 16 games?
32 games MAYBE, but not 16. You WERE paying attention to what Hill was... Errrrr WASN'T able to do were you not?
~Ceadder
Ceaddar, your man love with Smith is very transparent. The things errr Hill can't do are still better than the things Alex can do. Alex can't do anything and offers nothing. And by doubling his stats he probably meant that if Hill had 13 TD and 8 int in half a season. Double that for a whole season and that is what he is looking forward to. Pretty straight forward, no?
ALex Smith should be QB 3 at the very best. PErsonally I don't even think he belongs in the NFL. Have him play up there in Americas Hat, AKA Canada.
Mmmmm'kay Shaun is just so much better than Smith. Then he should have shown that TODAY, but from all accounts that I have seen Shaun was just flat. No Gore no Win. Isn't that the same thing that people were saying about Smith? I'll give Hill time, but he's on a short leash imho. If he looks flat against ST. LOUIS who got blown out today by Sheattle then I'm all for yanking the plug on him. Even if it's DURING the game.
There is no room for error based on the schedule that we have. I mean honestly folks we play half our division schedule in the 1st 4 weeks. We got LUCKY beating Arizona today.
~Ceadder
Ummm, Hill is better than Smith. Its 2009 bro, not 2005. Stop clinging to his useless c*ck. Can't blame Hill today on our "lucky" win...blame our blind dedication to the run after it was evident that it wasn't working.
Ummmmm what?!?
How can you NOT blame Hill? I mean let's be honest for a moment shall we? If Hill had HALF the talent that you believe he does then don't you think at all that we just MIGHT not have stuck with something that as you say WASN'T working?
I'm not going to take offense to you myopic thought process that I'm clinging to anything btw. It's not that I do not like Hill. I've been saying this since LAST YEAR that Hill is not the guy. Other people who BACK him have even stated similar things.
If your intent by suggesting that I swing from vines is to get me riled you failed miserably. I want the BEST guy under Center. So far it's looking like Hill is not THAT guy. Now whether it's Alex or Nate, remains to be seen. But Hill has the chance to step up and change my opinion of him as well as those who believe as I do.
And I stand by my opinion that if he's flat against St. Louis a team that got BLANKED and scored on at will today, then he must be removed. Seems to me though that it's not me that's swinging from a vine.
~Ceadder
Dude you're so ridiculous that you don't even warrant a response.
I agree. I obvious can't talk sense into someone who cant get Alex out of his mind.
...And we play Seattle next week, not St. Louis anywayz lolz. Did someone mention NOT knowing if Alex was the man or not. Lemme just say this, if you have it, you have it. Here are some young QB's that have "it".
Has it:
Ryan, Atlanta
Manning, Giants
Flacco, Baltimore
Sanchez, Jets
...Now we need moreltime to make a judgement on Nate but he has shown some wonderful promise. ALex NEVER showed that promise or that poise and at least in my eyes he definitely doesn't have "it" at the NFL level.
You donm't need to sit forever behind someone to learn. You need to have a decent team surrounding you, sure but a good QB makes the team better as a whole so it goes hand in hand.
Point of clarification for the obtuse in the Zone. Please point out WHERE, I stated that we play St. Louis next week.
I stated that if Hill comes out FLAT against St. Louis he should RIGHTFULLY be yanked. You read into it that I believe that we play the SOSAR's next week and it's not even what I said. We play them in week 4. So that should tell YOU that I am giving the man 4 freakin weeks.
I know you guys are much smarter than this, you're 9er fans. Stuff like this I expect from Raitards fans not my own compatriots for pete sake.
Was SUPPOSED to be a competition. FACT.
3 games during preseason. FACT. (Picked after 2)
Smith outperformed Hill. FACT. Hill was EXTREMELY flat in his appearances regardless of snaps taken.
Hill has now carried this trend into the regular season when it matters most. FACT. One decent drive out of 4 quarters is NOTHING to cheer about. Excessive 3 and outs are NOT good. These are FACTS.
But yet Leatha believes that I am not worth responding too. Yet did anyway.
And people keep throwing this Nate Davis to QB2 garbage around like they even truly understand that Nate had his success against 3rd and 4th teamers scratching and clawing to get a spot on their Camp teams. Are you freakin KIDDING ME????
This is the NFTRUCKINL You don't name players to roster spots based on how you FEEL about other players. Works in Madden, not so much for the real thing.
But hey screw it we'll fire Sing and McCloughan and name you guys to their positions. I mean come on already. Use your head for what the Lord intended it instead of a hat rack. Cool?
~Ceadder
Ohhhh yes. "If you have it you have it"
Here's some names that by your standards would NEVER have held the Lombardi over their head.
Jim Plunkett
Troy Aikman
Terry Bradshaw
and our very own QB who wore a [Kick Me] sign...
STEVE YOUNG
But of course you were nowhere around the decision making process and it's a good thing too for all concerned. I can name more QBs' if you wish but I'm sure you get the point. You never know until their careers are over what ANYONE will or will not do.
[ Edited by Ceadderman on Sep 14, 2009 at 15:49:09 ]
And yet you responded anyway.