Originally posted by Blitz:Originally posted by Axl49:Originally posted by redngoldnmyveins:Originally posted by Blitz:Originally posted by WestCoast:Originally posted by Blitz:Originally posted by Axl49:Originally posted by WheresWaldo:no a coach who want to win and be agressive would like the pats or colts or any other top notch team. you play to win like edwards said. you dont sit there and give them a chance you go for the kill when its there.Originally posted by Axl49:Originally posted by WheresWaldo:Originally posted by Axl49:Originally posted by DesiDez:
You guys are morons if you blame raye. The Viking had 3 TO and the niners ran plays to make them burn them. an incomplete pass stops the clock. This loss is solely on the defense
not the point you at least try to get the first u dnt just give up and give them the win. we blew it that last drive with out playcalling plain and simple man.
And if Hills threw a pick you guys would be all over Raye regardless. Straight hatin!
no thats the play you make to win ask any winning head coach and they would have thrown for the first thats how u win close games. you can win if you dnt try to win.
A team that has a s**tty defense would throw it on 3rd down. Ask any GOOD coach in the league.
BS man. You don;t go for no f**king kill when you have a 4 point lead, with 1 minute left, with a defense that has pitched a shutout the entire second half. You protect the ball and put the defense back on the field when they have playing that well for the prior 29 minutes, ESPECIALLY with a 4 point lead. (the other team needing a TD to win).
If you think giving Brett Favre the ball on the 20 with over a minute and playing prevent is the answer.....then i guess you just got proven wrong.
Your out to lunch on this one pal. I will explain why: If you think the offense can all of a sudden, convert a third down after having failed to convert what 90% of the opportunities prior, your out to lunch. Would you not agree that it is reasonable to expect an offense that has only converted 5% of it's first down opportunities to essentially have about a 5% chance of making it? So you would have a bout a 5% chance, in a passing situation, backed up in their terroority, against a team that has been harassing the s**t of your QB all day, agaisnt a team that is desperate to get their hands on that ball, make a big ass turnover, at all costs?
RAYE IS YOU....I DID NOT KNOW U HAVE ACCES TO THE NET
U BETTER GET A PLAYBOOK......
its like givin the ball back to manning or brady with 1 40 left you go for the win dude not the f**king conservative play man. thats not what championship teams do you dont sit there and hope for the best you go out there and win it yourself when the oppurtinity presents itself. ask walsh or lombardi they would have gone for it man.
Aww, BS man...Walsh was a smart dude, he didn't do anything he didn't have to do. He didn't take unnecessary risks, he was the king of managing the game.
How you guys are figuring that laying it on the offense to produce something they haven't produced all game, while, at the same time...denying the defense the opportunity to produce something they have produced for the entire second half (not even allowing them to get in field goal range), up to and including stuffing their ass the prior set of downs they had the ball, is beyond me.
well Hill had the hot hand in the 4th why change , throw it on first or second if we did not convert on 4th bootleg play anything insted up the gut and give the ball back to the vickes ! you live by the soward you die by the soward samuri mike. If you have it in your head we are not as good you are going to act and paly call as if we are not as good !