Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by fan49:Originally posted by kidash98:Originally posted by Kolohe:Originally posted by baltien:
While I would love nothing more to see Alex succeed on this team, I do not think it would be wise for him to start. The chief reason being, Hill showed us last year that he deserves the starting role.
And until he shows us that he can't handle it (by his play), it should remain his job.
Also, imagine if Smith starts and then tanks. It would be detrimental to the morale of our team, and all but erase the (little) progress that we made last year.
Alex is young, and can only benefit by sitting awhile longer and learning.
But then the argument could be 5 OC's in 5 years and we could yet again be looking at another QB competition.
I like Alex Smith, I really do....
But what's the difference with him learning new offense every year and with S. Hill learning the same thing and succeding??? Given, he (Smith) was hurt last year but it seems like Hill was able to adapt to the changes and play whereas Smith was stuck! Again, I do hope that Smith proves me wong but for the time being, I think the QB is for Hill to lose.
- 98
succeding against no good d's and playoff teams not risking getting hurt. sing made the team win. the defense stepped up o didnt change too much except at one point letting hos go, and improvement from jto and dilfer to hilll, not that hard. and were looking at what 5 different systems that alex played and what hill played in 2? if you need proof about garbage d's look not hard.. iv posted plenty of times hill played d's ranked in the late 20's and hill couldnt get 200 yards, and alex busted what 289 against the number 1 d in the nfl. (same year) and yes i like hill but no matter how i look at it he got put into easy situations unlike alex smith.
Aaah yes the "all he did was beat crappy teams" argument. C'mon man, can you seriously put that on Hill. What Hill did was play the cards he was dealt, he nor any other person could have changed that.
But also being that this statement my be true, still does not change the fact that he still hadnt been put in difficult situations. Hill has come in to play factually at the end of every season that he's played for us soo far. Always after a first and second guy falter. And some may not want to talk about it, but it does make a big difference if your beginning a season or trying to salvage one and it dont matter what part of the season you play. Not knocking the guy cause he has won games for us. But like i said even in that he's 7-3, i think or soo. But i laugh at the fact that it's over how many years, and what part of the season. Like i said to one of the moderators earlier, if i've been on the team for 4 years, played 2 games my first season, 2 my next, 3 my third and 6 my fourth. So thats a total of 13 games over a 4yr period lets not forget. I finish the end of the fourth season, and win some games. Now some of my fans say hey his record is 8-5, he deserves to start. Now do i really deserve to start being that the majorty of my wins came in my first 3 years. You see how just cause someone is 7-3 dont mean much. Let it be 7-3 at the beginning of season, or as the backup in the first half of the season as well, not just ALWAYS second half. Hill cant help the cards he was dealt when starting, with that being said, it doesnt change the fact that it was still second half of the season ever year he's played with us and that his winning record isnt much at all because it's not for an entire season, just won games and lost spread out over almost 4 years.