LISTEN: Are The 49ers Showing Their Hand? →

There are 260 users in the forums

Is Battle really worth a roster spot at this point?

Shop Find 49ers gear online

Is Battle really worth a roster spot at this point?

  • buck
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,137
Originally posted by cNiner:
Originally posted by IWantWinners:
So he can hopefully land with another team. We don't need this dude anymore!

We'll go into the season like this:

Bruce
Morgan
Crabtree
Jones
Hill

first of all Bruce will not be starter he will be coming of the bench, sing said that !

When did Singletary say that? Do you have a cite?
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Originally posted by cNiner:
Originally posted by IWantWinners:
So he can hopefully land with another team. We don't need this dude anymore!

We'll go into the season like this:

Bruce
Morgan
Crabtree
Jones
Hill

first of all Bruce will not be starter he will be coming of the bench, sing said that !

Link?

Originally posted by Allx9er:
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Originally posted by cNiner:
Originally posted by IWantWinners:
So he can hopefully land with another team. We don't need this dude anymore!

We'll go into the season like this:

Bruce
Morgan
Crabtree
Jones
Hill

first of all Bruce will not be starter he will be coming of the bench, sing said that !

Link?


Still waiting...
Buce might not make the team you heard it first here.
Originally posted by Lott49ersFan:

Why? The thread is more than valid.
Originally posted by TXNinerFan52:
Buce might not make the team you heard it first here.

yes, that's because we don't have a WR named "Buce".

-9fA
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by Lott49ersFan:

Why? The thread is more than valid.

True, i guess what he's trying to say is that we've gone over this more than once.

-9fA
Originally posted by IWantWinners:
Originally posted by kronik:
I third that

I think if we cut him, he will land with either the Rams or Seahawks guaranteed.

Not gonna hurt us. He's mediocre on his best day. Now, something like the Cards trading Boldin to us.. That would hurt them because Boldin has the ability to shred the Cards when we play them. The Rams losing Holt to us would have hurt them for the same reason, just like losing Bruce to us did. But us losing Battle to Seattle or STL? What's he gonna do to us? Throw a mean block on Walt Harris? Meanwhile, Patrick Willis is making the stop on the runningback anyway so the one thing Battle does well doesn't even make a difference on the play..

Not a big deal.
Originally posted by Bryant4everYoung:
He should be converted to a TE. Hes a PR Specialist, a former QB and a hes Fhysical with an F. Too valuable.[/indent]

PR Specialist? WHAT!? If you mean he can field a punt, I'll give you that. But a specialist? NO. Devin Hester is a punt return specialist. Arnaz Battle was not anywhere near good enough to consider him a specialist. He was just a guy that was back there fielding punts because we had nobody else who was better. We brought in Allen Rossum because we didn't have any good kick or punt returners. People need to understand this.
Originally posted by kronik:
Originally posted by fanmusclecars:
Your assuming that only 5 WR's make the roster. The niners have kept 6 on the roster for the past 3-4 seasons.

We only kept 6 WR's last year (in Mike Martz pass happy offense)


A sixth WR sounds like a waste of a roster spot.

Originally posted by 9erfanAUS:
Originally posted by 49erRider:
Originally posted by Lott49ersFan:

Why? The thread is more than valid.

True, i guess what he's trying to say is that we've gone over this more than once.

-9fA

I know I've said this about Battle in other threads, but this thread is about how we don't need him. The other threads were about other things and the Battle debates were just side discussions. Unless somebody else made a similar thread with the topic being how we don't need Battle and I missed it..
Yeah Battle's a good as gone. I would even keep Ziegler over him.

And yes cut Simms, cut Keasey.
Originally posted by Trajik1:
Yeah Battle's a good as gone. I would even keep Ziegler over him.

And yes cut Simms, cut Keasey.

I would keep Zeigler over Battle only because we don't know what we have in Zeigler. We know we have mediocrity in Battle and mediocrity does not cut it. Zeigler might be better or worse than Battle, but we don't know because he hasn't had his chance to prove himself. Battle has had many chances and hasn't done much with them. He was the "most reliable" receiver on our squad for a few years, but who exactly was he more reliable than? A bunch of nobodies! That proves NOTHING.

Basically what I'm saying is I'll take the uknown over the known when the known is mediocrity - at best.

As for Sims, he's garbage and needs to be let go. The reason he's still around is because they dropped Jonas Jennings so we need some depth, but Sims has already proven he can't handle the RT position so we'd be better off picking up a tackle elsewhere.

Zak Keasey is just a complete joke and has no business being on this team.
Originally posted by Trajik1:
Yeah Battle's a good as gone. I would even keep Ziegler over him.

And yes cut Simms, cut Keasey.

Yes definitely Keasy and Simms and sadly Battle. I like Battle he has worked his ass off on some pretty crappy teams, dude deserves better, but this pro football a serious business.

Battle if cut will play elsewhere, he is a fierce downfield blocker and is a consummate pro, he is a go to guy on third downs who seems to know where the sticks are, all that said I think we do have better talent on this roster so it is nothing personal it is all about the business of winning, I will miss Battle especially on 3rd downs!
Originally posted by GolittaCamper:
I will miss Battle especially on 3rd downs!

co-sign
Share 49ersWebzone