Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:Oh, that's just mean……..maybe true but mean
Will probably win a ring when they play us in Levis.
There are 398 users in the forums
OT Jaylon Moore, Chiefs
Mar 10, 2025 at 9:57 PM
- Cg9erSF
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,413
Mar 10, 2025 at 10:08 PM
- 9moon
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,619
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by Cg9erSF:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:Oh, that's just mean……..maybe true but mean
Will probably win a ring when they play us in Levis.
It was really an idiotic move by KS10 to put a rookie on 95 w/o any help from the backfield.. we gave 44 the most money at his position to run a swing pass where the ball was never going to him instead of helping out 76
Mar 16, 2025 at 5:24 AM
- TheXFactor
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,990
Originally posted by jcs:
A little shocked by what an above average backup OT can bring in F/A
yes, for real, major over pay
Sep 6, 2025 at 6:26 AM
- steiber
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,607
Odd how KC is paying him 15 million to sit on the bench.
Sep 6, 2025 at 11:34 AM
- Hopper
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,234
Originally posted by steiber:
Odd how KC is paying him 15 million to sit on the bench.
Highest paid backup swing tackle in the league.
Sep 6, 2025 at 12:14 PM
- 9ers4eva
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,386
Originally posted by steiber:
Odd how KC is paying him 15 million to sit on the bench.
Especially since I have no doubt he'd be a better LG than Kingsley.
Sep 7, 2025 at 7:40 PM
- lamontb
- Veteran
- Posts: 32,509
It ain't odd. They realized they overpaid him. No need to make it worse by playing him just b/c you paid him.
Sep 18, 2025 at 1:32 PM
- GEEK
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,323
Originally posted by lamontb:It ain't odd. They realized they overpaid him. No need to make it worse by playing him just b/c you paid him.
They also signed him not knowing the draft outcome - they selected an OT in the first round that was coming back from injury. And really they can get out of the contract after one year.
So I wouldn't be surprised if we sign him for a budget deal next year.
Sep 30, 2025 at 3:26 PM
- LifelongNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,940
Originally posted by GEEK:
Originally posted by lamontb:
It ain't odd. They realized they overpaid him. No need to make it worse by playing him just b/c you paid him.
They also signed him not knowing the draft outcome - they selected an OT in the first round that was coming back from injury. And really they can get out of the contract after one year.
So I wouldn't be surprised if we sign him for a budget deal next year.
That would be great for us. Solid swing tackle and we can let Burford walk.
Sep 30, 2025 at 7:42 PM
- 9ers4eva
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,386
Think it's far more likely the Chiefs cut Jawaan Taylor and start Moore in 26.
Oct 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM
- lamontb
- Veteran
- Posts: 32,509
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Think it's far more likely the Chiefs cut Jawaan Taylor and start Moore in 26.
Im shocked Taylor is still starting
Oct 1, 2025 at 8:25 PM
- 9ers4eva
- Veteran
- Posts: 21,386
Originally posted by lamontb:
Im shocked Taylor is still starting
Kyle isn't the only one that likes their veterans to a fault sometimes.