Beckham is the only one of the three who is practicing with his team. Why should the Giants sign Beckham? They're clearly in win-now mode. The fact that they didn't draft a quarterback at #2 makes that pretty clear. Beckham is a huge part of their offense, and winning now means getting him involved in the offense right now. Why shouldn't they sign him? He wants to be the highest paid receiver in the league, and he has significant character issues.
Why should the Rams sign Donald? Well, some people think he's the best defensive player in the league. Why shouldn't they sign him? The Rams have a number of young, talented players, and the NFL has a hard cap. How much can they allocate to an interior defensive lineman?
Why should the Raiders sign Mack? One might argue that he has the biggest impact on his team, as the Raiders aren't really loaded with defensive talent. Mack is a disruptive player, plus the Raiders are moving soon, and keeping some continuity is important. Why wouldn't they? The Raiders are among the poorest teams in the NFL, and they don't have much cap space. If they could franchise Mack this year, they'd have a lot more space to sign him to a long-term contract next year.
What do you think? Which player should be signed first?
[ Edited by Garoppolis on Aug 8, 2018 at 2:13 PM ]