There are 194 users in the forums

The LOS ANG7L7S RAMS Threat (Didn't Win LOL)

Tickets Find deals on 49ers games ⇨
Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:
Worst team in super bowl history

Let's not forget they didn't even belong there the Saints should've been in the Super Bowl. So pathetic the rams are a joke especially in the playoffs
  • LVJay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,055
McVay gave their fans a nice little tease...couple good seasons, couple playoff appearances, SB loss. They done!
[ Edited by LVJay on Apr 26, 2019 at 4:19 PM ]
Originally posted by LVJay:
McVay gave their fans a nice little tease...couple good seasons, couple playoff appearances, SB loss. They done!

They would of had a chance to win more games if they drafted a better qb
Los Angeles, objectively, what say you?

Scale: 4, 3, 2, 1

Offensive Personnel:
QB: Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Arizona
RB/FB: Los Angeles, Arizona, San Francisco, Seattle
TE1/TE2/OW: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Arizona, Seattle
XWR/SWR/ZWR: Los Angeles, Arizona, San Francisco, Seattle
LT/RT: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, Arizona
C/LG/RG: Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, Arizona

Offensive Talent: Los Angeles 20, San Francisco 17, Seattle 12, Arizona 11

Defensive Personnel:
NT/DT: Los Angeles, San Francisco, Arizona, Seattle
DE/ER: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Arizona, Seattle
SAM/MIKE/TED/WILL: Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Arizona
RCB/SCB/LCB: Arizona, Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco
FS/SS: Los Angeles, Seattle, Arizona. San Francisco

Defensive Talent: Los Angeles 15, San Francisco 12, Seattle 12, Arizona 11

Special Teams:
LS/PK/P: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, Arizona

Special Teams Talent: San Francisco 4, Los Angeles 3, Seattle 2, Arizona 1

Total: Los Angeles 38, San Francisco 33, Seattle 26, Arizona 23
[ Edited by NCommand on May 18, 2019 at 6:38 AM ]
  • evil
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 38,256
Originally posted by NCommand:
Los Angeles, objectively, what say you?

Offensive Personnel:
QB: Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Arizona
RB/FB: Los Angeles, Arizona, San Francisco, Seattle
TE1/TE2/OW: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Arizona, Seattle
XWR/SWR/ZWR: Los Angeles, Arizona, San Francisco, Seattle
LT/RT: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, Arizona
C/LG/RG: Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, Arizona

Offensive Talent: Los Angeles 20, San Francisco 17, Seattle 12, Arizona 11

Defensive Personnel:
NT/DT: Los Angeles, San Francisco, Arizona, Seattle
DE/ER: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Arizona, Seattle
SAM/MIKE/TED/WILL: Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Arizona
RCB/SCB/LCB: Arizona, Seattle, Los Angeles, San Francisco
FS/SS: Los Angeles, Seattle, Arizona. San Francisco

Defensive Talent: Los Angeles 15, San Francisco 12, Seattle 12, Arizona 11

Special Teams:
LS/PK/P: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, Arizona

Special Teams Talent: San Francisco 4, Los Angeles 3, Seattle 2, Arizona 1

Total: Los Angeles 38, San Francisco 33, Seattle 26, Arizona 23

I think Jones/Suggs is a better edge duo than Fowler/Matthews and with Hicks at ILB I would place AZ ahead of LA at LB when considering all 4 LB spots.
Originally posted by evil:
I think Jones/Suggs is a better edge duo than Fowler/Matthews and with Hicks at ILB I would place AZ ahead of LA at LB when considering all 4 LB spots.

Good call. The one I listed was an example from a 9er fan. Simply assign a 4,3 2,1 to the order and add 'em up yourself and see how it shakes out.

It's an exercise where it appears, from a talent perspective, we've slightly pulled ahead of Seattle's talent pool while they retool (and we rebuild). We're not at Los Angeles' level yet.

That matches fans expectations that we are now a 7-9 win team on the cusp of the playoffs and possibly 2nd in the division.

That's obviously not factoring in coaching, development, experience at QB, depth, health, etc. but it gives you an idea.
[ Edited by NCommand on May 4, 2019 at 7:24 AM ]
  • evil
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 38,256
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by evil:
I think Jones/Suggs is a better edge duo than Fowler/Matthews and with Hicks at ILB I would place AZ ahead of LA at LB when considering all 4 LB spots.

Good call. The one I listed was an example from a 9er fan. Simply assign a 4,3 2,1 to the order and add 'em up yourself and see how it shakes out.

It's an exercise where it appears, from a talent perspective, we've slightly pulled ahead of Seattle's talent pool while they retool (and we rebuild). We're not at Los Angeles' level yet.

That matches fans expectations that we are now a 7-9 win team on the cusp of the playoffs and possibly 2nd in the division.

That's obviously not factoring in coaching, development, experience at QB, depth, health, etc. but it gives you an idea.

Yeah I would not even say we have the best edge rush right now seeing as Nick is unproven. We probably sit third, but can quickly climb to the top if Nick develops.
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by evil:
I think Jones/Suggs is a better edge duo than Fowler/Matthews and with Hicks at ILB I would place AZ ahead of LA at LB when considering all 4 LB spots.

Good call. The one I listed was an example from a 9er fan. Simply assign a 4,3 2,1 to the order and add 'em up yourself and see how it shakes out.

It's an exercise where it appears, from a talent perspective, we've slightly pulled ahead of Seattle's talent pool while they retool (and we rebuild). We're not at Los Angeles' level yet.

That matches fans expectations that we are now a 7-9 win team on the cusp of the playoffs and possibly 2nd in the division.

That's obviously not factoring in coaching, development, experience at QB, depth, health, etc. but it gives you an idea.

Yeah I would not even say we have the best edge rush right now seeing as Nick is unproven. We probably sit third, but can quickly climb to the top if Nick develops.

I like this objectivity.
I don't see how you have the rams listed as number 1 for g/c when they currently have no starter for either position. Both starters are gone and they are relying on rookies and young unproven players to replace high quality starters. I think they should be way down the list until they prove otherwise.
Originally posted by Izyniner:
I don't see how you have the rams listed as number 1 for g/c when they currently have no starter for either position. Both starters are gone and they are relying on rookies and young unproven players to replace high quality starters. I think they should be way down the list until they prove otherwise.

It's crazy to think we may have the best C/G in the division. Lol

Originally posted by Waterbear:
It's crazy to think we may have the best C/G in the division. Lol


It might also be why the niners are signing any
one they think is decent at c/g just to keep them out of the rams camp.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,883
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by ramsfan:
10 wins in two seasons. that is LOL. We lost by 10 pts in SB. 49ers are drafting second. LOL. SF is such a loser organization.

sounds like something I would say, lol

But fa real, your team embarrassed themselves on NATIONAL TV. At least when the 49ers play, they're only embarrassing the 15 fans that watch them on local TV.

Wow, ramsfan is back, I haven't seen him since the greatest turds on turf show back in the eary 2000's.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,883
Originally posted by socal1632:
Going to be impressed if Goff exits the field upright after this draft. This line is going to crush people. Teams are going to have to sacrifice a back to the Defo God to keep their qb from becoming part of the turf.

Love this statement!
  • FL9er
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 7,098
Still think they're the best team in the division.
Blasphemy.
Originally posted by FL9er:
Still think they're the best team in the division.
Share 49erswebzone