Eric Mangini Thread | Page 187 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Would much rather have Mangina than Vrabel.

our defense will suck again with mangini, so i rather take a chance with vrabel.

I'm not so sure the defense will be bad if Mangini stays - they seemed to be getting better at their secondary assignments towards the end of last year. His system is evidently complicated and it could be that the vets will perform better from the beginning this year if he keeps the same general system.

Jan 19, 2016 at 11:53 AM

#2797

GoreGoreGore
10HourChicken
Posts: 61,347

Originally posted by crake49:

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Would much rather have Mangina than Vrabel.

our defense will suck again with mangini, so i rather take a chance with vrabel.

I'm not so sure the defense will be bad if Mangini stays - they seemed to be getting better at their secondary assignments towards the end of last year. His system is evidently complicated and it could be that the vets will perform better from the beginning this year if he keeps the same general system.

ya, they did. maybe with a 2nd year our defense will improve. still, i wouldn't mind at all if we made a switch at DC.

Jan 19, 2016 at 11:54 AM

#2798

Antix
Veteran
Posts: 9,915

Cant count on Mangini..but besides I guess Pettine he's better than anybody else...which really really sucks. My prognosis for next year isnt good so I d almost rather just go with Vrabel to see if maybe he's got what it takes...but I doubt he does.

Jan 19, 2016 at 11:55 AM

#2799

crake49
Veteran
Posts: 13,201

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
ya, they did. maybe with a 2nd year our defense will improve. still, i wouldn't mind at all if we made a switch at DC.

I don't care that much about it either. The only thing that concerns me a bit is that most of the defensive players have already said they'd like Mangini to stay so I'd like to see those guys happy with a scheme.

I just want good defense. I don't buy this entire argument that a fast-paced offense automatically leads to bad defense. If you want to get off the field, stop the other team.

Jan 19, 2016 at 12:47 PM

#2800

Eli_23
Veteran
Posts: 5,770

No to Mangina.

Yes to Vrabel

Jan 19, 2016 at 12:53 PM

#2801

CityKing415
Veteran
Posts: 4,048

No more Mangina

Jan 19, 2016 at 1:33 PM

#2802

4everFaithful
Veteran
Posts: 6,646

Ehhh I dont want Vrabel, as a LBs coach ya but not DC

Jan 19, 2016 at 1:37 PM

#2803

ReD8ighty
Veteran
Posts: 147

i was really hoping he would be let go.

Jan 19, 2016 at 5:27 PM

#2804

BuZzB05
Veteran
Posts: 3,615

Originally posted by Eli_23:
No to Mangina.

Yes to Vrabel

I wonder. Vrabel can imagination new create for many defense style. If he know how to stop on quarterback or rb. He was experienced to play football from New England Patriots. I dont mind Vrabel can join us his DC. Let me see if he is smart as dc then why not.

Jan 19, 2016 at 8:00 PM

#2805

Oakland-Niner
Member
Posts: 24,062

Originally posted by 4everFaithful:
Ehhh I dont want Vrabel, as a LBs coach ya but not DC

Seriously. This isn't amateur hour at The Apollo. The fans deserve better than a Vrable. I can't believe we are filling our ranks with all these east cost guys.

[ Edited by Oakland-Niner on Jan 19, 2016 at 8:00 PM ]