Originally posted by DonnieDarko:Is this why LMJ was inactive Sunday?
Was thinking the same thing
There are 266 users in the forums
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:Is this why LMJ was inactive Sunday?
Originally posted by frozen49er:
I'd prefer Gordon, but I dont think thats going to happen.
Boldon, Crabtree, Manningham, Nicks, VD. Now who can cover that? I doubt even Seattle can match up. No burners, Ill concede that, but thats a hell of a WR core right there.
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Originally posted by frozen49er:
I'd prefer Gordon, but I dont think thats going to happen.
Boldon, Crabtree, Manningham, Nicks, VD. Now who can cover that? I doubt even Seattle can match up. No burners, Ill concede that, but thats a hell of a WR core right there.
crabs and manningham not gonna be 100 percent this year, need nicks as a backup plan if they are ineffective. id take a 50 percent crabtree over the garbage we putting out on the field besides boldin though.
Originally posted by gold49digger:
I doubt we will make any moves. Don't get your hopes up guys.
Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
To all those who keep saying Manningham and Nicks aren't burners......do you guys have amnesia when we played the Giants in 2011 regular season? The big super bowl catch by MM?
Did anyone watch their playoff games against Falcons and Packers? All it was, was deep passes to those two with Cruz underneath.
Hakeem Nicks is a great WR when healthy and motivated.
Would rather have Crabtree over Nicks given what we saw at the end of last season, his years in SF and being less injury prone, but prior to that Nicks was perceived to be a much better WR.
l
To have both would be sick in the short term. Long term it couldn't work out unless Nick's market value drops considerably...
Originally posted by stunder49:
Jon baldwin for nicks and 1st round and cash money