Originally posted by Kaep4MVP:
Originally posted by
Puckdaddy:
Was the solution to the Niners issues was to start playing outside of the rules because the refs were "allowing them to play"? If so where do THEY draw the line?
No, they should've just plain played better. They came out lethargic and let the Ravens out play them. The Ravens were more physical, but they were also just playing better.
Doesnt this jeopardize player safety?
It was the HarBowl. I don't think they really cared.
How do you know what was or wasnt going to be called?
I don't, but it was pretty obvious with how much each team was getting away with.
How would they know exactly how lienient those refs would be on any particular play?
You don't, you play physical until you force them to throw a flag.
If not, were they subject to be doomed?
No. Play better than the other team. Play Niner football throughout the whole game and we win.
Were they obligated to have a lead that gave them "insurance" against the refs?
I don't think being down 28-6 would be the most ideal situation if you plan on winning the Super Bowl, no.
Can you name teams that won the super bowl that didnt have insurance?
Don't know, but this was much more fun than to watch a penalty filled game like the Seahawks vs Steelers SB.
Are your standards logical or reasonable?
I'm just trying to look at things in a non-homeristic sense. And I think calling the game rigged is so homeristic that it's laughable.
Well what reason do you have to be so sure that it was not rigged?
Ill address your answers dude.
No, they should've just plain played better. They came out lethargic and let the Ravens out play them. The Ravens were more physical, but they were also just playing better.
Tell me something. Did the Packers outplay the Seahawks in week 2? Did we outplay the Saints in the playoffs "all game" last year? I can go on for ages with this. Its not how you start a game its how you finish. There are no perfect games, therefore its unrealistic to have this as a standard. Like I told you before, The Ravens didnt play 4 quarters of good football. Where were they from 7 minutes in the 3rd - 8 minutes in the 4th? You can continue denying the obvious but it wont change the fact that you are wrong.
It was the HarBowl. I don't think they really cared.
And its ok that they happen to not care without notification? Thats strange.
I don't, but it was pretty obvious with how much each team was getting away with.
Well please present your cases. All you presented was the Flacco late hit. Although I dont agree, I will give you that one for the sake of arguement. Is that all you have? Because if so your arguement is over.
You don't, you play physical until you force them to throw a flag.
Well whats your definition of "physical"? In my opinion we did play physical. There is a difference between physical, and a violation. Do we hold everyone on the third down of the Ravens last drive? Culliver did exactly what you suggested and was flagged. So again Kaep4MVP, you are clearly being biased for the Ravens because your proposed arguements did actually happen only to be called differently on both sides.
No. Play better than the other team. Play Niner football throughout the whole game and we win.
Ok, did the 9ers play 9ers football in the NFC championship "all game"? Would the Ravens say they played Ravens football "all game"? Your predetermined outcomes are what hinders your view alot.
I don't think being down 28-6 would be the most ideal situation if you plan on winning the Super Bowl, no.
What about being down 17-0 or being up 28-3 and find yourself up by only 2 points with about 9 minutes left? Thats the point I am trying to explain to you. Football is not a movie scene or script. You dont know what shape the game will take, as long as you are able to overcome a bad start, you cannot blame what has been fixed as the detriment to the game.
Don't know, but this was much more fun than to watch a penalty filled game like the Seahawks vs Steelers SB
Its one thing to call unwarranted penalties and another to call just penalties. Again, where in the rulebook does it give a particular time in the game, and specific game, or anytime that a penalty is not a penalty? The only explanation is that some of you are trying to put clean clothes on a dirty body.
"I'm just trying to look at things in a non-homeristic sense. And I think calling the game rigged is so homeristic that it's laughable"
Its not about "homer and non homer", but a matter of fact or fiction. You seem to put corruption pass the NFL, yet they just recently claimed to have "substantial evidence that Johnathan Vilma ran a bounty program". Though we have yet to see any evidence. But go on putting them on a pedestal and believing they could do no wrong. America, America, god shed his grace on thee.
[ Edited by Puckdaddy on Feb 6, 2013 at 10:36 AM ]