Michael Vick named starter

Sep 21, 2010 at 2:48 PM

DaDivaRecieva15
Veteran
Posts: 37,745

Per NFL.com Breaking News.

Sep 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM

zozell
Veteran
Posts: 2,961

Saw that one coming... Good for him!

Sep 21, 2010 at 2:52 PM

kray28
Veteran
Posts: 12,345

Originally posted by zozell:
Saw that one coming... Good for him!

Reid is losing his touch...he should have waited until later in the week to announce it so his next opponent would have spent a large period of time preparing for the other guy.

Sep 21, 2010 at 2:54 PM

FredFlintstone
Veteran
Posts: 45,718

f**k now we gotta deal with him wk 5

Sep 21, 2010 at 2:59 PM

valrod33
Hall of Small
Posts: 137,970

Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
f**k now we gotta deal with him wk 5

yeah but he has to deal with Willis in week 5

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:00 PM

toeknee
Veteran
Posts: 54,571

Good for him. Didn't they just pay kolb like a starter though? Lol

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM

ninerfan4life
Veteran
Posts: 24,883

Vick still sucks.

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:16 PM

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

That game against the Eagles just got a lot harder.

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:22 PM

SolRebe1
Veteran
Posts: 13,446

Originally posted by susweel:
That game against the Eagles just got a lot harder.

I remember when we had J. Peterson, he was great at keeping Vick in check. That being said our Def is better than the Lions

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:26 PM

#10

boast
Hella Fame
Posts: 149,566

Originally posted by susweel:
That game against the Eagles just got a lot harder.

we'll be fine. their O-line is in shambles and will most likely still be an issue in three weeks.

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:28 PM

#11

tjd808185
Veteran
Posts: 26,006

Originally posted by susweel:
That game against the Eagles just got a lot harder.

Vick tried running on us last year and left the game with a quad injury. Bring him on.

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:32 PM

#12

HessianDud
Veteran
Posts: 22,995

good for him, he earned it. he's been on fire the last two games.

gonna be tough for us, but I think we can bring him back to earth.

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:35 PM

#13

susweel
Hall of Nepal
Posts: 120,278

Im happy for Vick he deserved to be the starter. Now its gonna be a lot harder to trade for him next year.

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:38 PM

#14

valrod33
Hall of Small
Posts: 137,970

Originally posted by susweel:
Im happy for Vick he deserved to be the starter. Now its gonna be a lot harder to trade for him next year.

He is a free agent, so yeah its gonna be real hard to trade for him

Sep 21, 2010 at 3:40 PM

#15

tjd808185
Veteran
Posts: 26,006

Originally posted by susweel:
Im happy for Vick he deserved to be the starter. Now its gonna be a lot harder to trade for him next year.

Isn't he a free agent at the end of the year. He only signed a 2 year deal.