Originally posted by RealShaloop:
we have to take this guy if hes there at 34
Heck at 31st we should take him. It would be a miracle if he can survive that late teens to late 20s gauntlet.
There are 254 users in the forums
Originally posted by RealShaloop:
we have to take this guy if hes there at 34
Originally posted by Rascal:
Yes, I know what you are talking about. He is not explosive like your Tavon Austin and Cordarrelle Patterson in that regard. He might not shake the DB at the point of contact, he will run past them on a longer vertical route or if he is still jammed up he is not so concerned cos he knows at 6'4" with a vertical leap of 40", he can beat the DBs up top as long as the QB throws a high ball to let him compete. But, you are right, he is not a big run the catch type receiver. He truly is a deep ball guy, 50, 60, 70 yarders, going up in taking the top off and end zone high fade type plays are his areas of forte.
Originally posted by dhp318:
He's sort of like Randy Moss, except he doesn't run a 4.2. Which makes him an ok, but not top tier prospect. 3rd rounder for me, but I can see why people like him.
Originally posted by LieutKaffee:
Hunter could definitely be good, but when I hear that a WR prospect's biggest weaknesses are maintaining focus and CATCHING THE DAMN BALL, I get a little worried. Seems possible he will just always be a good with good length and athleticism who doesn't consistently make plays.
I would not go nearly as far as to predict he will be a bust, but to me his "red flags" are more likely to remain problematic than Patterson's.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Rascal, where are you coming up with all these articles on Hunter. lol.
Originally posted by Rascal:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Rascal, where are you coming up with all these articles on Hunter. lol.
Err, Google ? LOL.
Originally posted by LieutKaffee:
Hunter could definitely be good, but when I hear that a WR prospect's biggest weaknesses are maintaining focus and CATCHING THE DAMN BALL, I get a little worried. Seems possible he will just always be a good with good length and athleticism who doesn't consistently make plays.
I would not go nearly as far as to predict he will be a bust, but to me his "red flags" are more likely to remain problematic than Patterson's.