If you are so fixated on drafting Stephen Hill, why not take Tommy Streeter instead? | Page 3

Apr 12, 2012 at 1:59 PM

GolittaCamper
Veteran
Posts: 7,277

Originally posted by nickbradley:

Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
No matter what a person says, if you like a guy over another, you won't listen (I don't mean you personally, I mean the bigger YOU). It's like trying to explain to someone who doesn't like Mexican food why they should like it...really doesn't matter if the other guy just prefers Italian.

BTW, nobody is stopping you from having that discussion, you're just not likely to resolve anything.

Their love for Hill is irrational - I am going to break their will to fight with rational logic...

"Don't make me angry, you would like me if I were angry, I'll rant and then back it up with facts from reliable sources"~ The Credible Hulk!

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:01 PM

#32

CorvaNinerFan
Veteran
Posts: 10,400

I'd rather have Brian Quick...much better route runner, which is paramount in WCO. Like Hill, Streeter's on the raw side.

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM

#33

nickbradley
Member
Posts: 3,755

I also like Brian Quick in the 2nd or 3rd as a big Flanker prospect

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:09 PM

#34

DirtyP
Member
Posts: 1,210

If you like Streeter so much, why not take Hill instead?

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:16 PM

#35

RonMexico
Moderator
Posts: 74,748

Originally posted by JustinNiner:
id rather have streeter and fleener than hill

this

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM

#36

SFL49ER
Veteran
Posts: 4,952

To me, I don't think they will have the same production as each other. I think Hill will be a better pro. I could be wrong too. Some people have bias towards certain players. Some don't.

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:27 PM

#37

49ersalldaway126
Veteran
Posts: 14,549

hill plays faster than streeter

also streeter has the rawest hands in the draft he drops a lot of passes ( a lot)

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:34 PM

#38

nickbradley
Member
Posts: 3,755

Originally posted by DirtyP:
If you like Streeter so much, why not take Hill instead?

Because it's a difference of THREE rounds! a 1st and a 4th!

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:42 PM

#39

niners9
Veteran
Posts: 1,286

Outside of Blackmon and Floyd, I would rather have streeter in the 3rd round as the WR we select

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:51 PM

#40

jreff22
Veteran
Posts: 65,482

Originally posted by nickbradley:

Originally posted by DirtyP:
If you like Streeter so much, why not take Hill instead?

Because it's a difference of THREE rounds! a 1st and a 4th!

says you

Apr 12, 2012 at 2:54 PM

#41

nickbradley
Member
Posts: 3,755

Originally posted by jreff22:
says you

Says PFW's draft value board that's based on conversations with NFL teams.

Apr 12, 2012 at 3:51 PM

#42

Kaz9er
Veteran
Posts: 519

Originally posted by nickbradley:

Originally posted by jreff22:
says you

Says PFW's draft value board that's based on conversations with NFL teams.

I see what your saying about PFW, but they are not the end all be all for player rankings. Every teams big board is different.

Apr 12, 2012 at 3:54 PM

#43

jreff22
Veteran
Posts: 65,482

Originally posted by nickbradley:

Originally posted by jreff22:
says you

Says PFW's draft value board that's based on conversations with NFL teams.

I can find numerous rankings that are waaaay off. Nobody knows the value of every player exactly. Teams reach, players drop.....its the draft anything can happen.

Apr 12, 2012 at 4:06 PM

#44

buck
Veteran
Posts: 13,137

At the combine, pro days, and workouts, Hill has shown that he has good hands; Streeter has not.

Not sure you can teach good hands.

Hill in the first is a better choice than Streeter later in the draft.

I hope this meets your standards of rational logic. If not,oh well.

Apr 12, 2012 at 7:23 PM

#45

Travisty13
Veteran
Posts: 5,263

Originally posted by DaDivaRecieva15:
another useless thread

This. That's all this guy does, is make useless threads.