There are 153 users in the forums
Is Bradford damaged goods?
Oct 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM
- GoreForMore
- Member
- Posts: 194
i wouldnt touc him in the 1st round, we cant afford to lose a pick on more shoulder injuries...... i would take him in the second or 3rd though. i like mccoy in the 1st
Oct 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM
- LBSI9ers
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,458
Hey 84sheepdog, I watched Clausen again today against BC. He threw the ball well AT 26/39 FOR 246. what I see and still say is he can throw the ball well for 5 yards to 10 yards. But he really doesn't throw the ball well for anything greater than that. Where I question his NFL ability is highlighted at the goal line. On two seperate passes in the second quarter, the defender should have intercepted his throws. Is he first round talent: yes. Top ten: maybe. Could he be S. Hill. Yep. But no matter what, I think Bradford is much much better than Clausen, as I first posted.
Oct 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 63,118
Originally posted by LBSI9ers:
Hey 84sheepdog, I watched Clausen again today against BC. He threw the ball well AT 26/39 FOR 246. what I see and still say is he can throw the ball well for 5 yards to 10 yards. But he really doesn't throw the ball well for anything greater than that. Where I question his NFL ability is highlighted at the goal line. On two seperate passes in the second quarter, the defender should have intercepted his throws. Is he first round talent: yes. Top ten: maybe. Could he be S. Hill. Yep. But no matter what, I think Bradford is much much better than Clausen, as I first posted.
I'm with you, I like Bradford more than Claussen. Brady Quinn was a much better prospect coming outta college than Claussen is, IMO of course, and I'd certainly take Quinn over Claussen.
Oct 24, 2009 at 5:04 PM
- hofer36
- Veteran
- Posts: 8,257
i hope bradford isnt going to make an excuse that its hard to play with your throwing shoulder seperated---obviously this board has disproved that notion