Originally posted by Tman:I'll be back as well, defending my ability to have a top 2 pick and lose him immediately for the entire season for the 3rd straight year
So you will determine if Gordon or Elliott hold out or if Gurley's girly
There are 265 users in the forums
Originally posted by Tman:I'll be back as well, defending my ability to have a top 2 pick and lose him immediately for the entire season for the 3rd straight year
Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by Tman:I'll be back as well, defending my ability to have a top 2 pick and lose him immediately for the entire season for the 3rd straight year
So you will determine if Gordon or Elliott hold out or if Gurley's girly
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:An opening just popped up in the league
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:I still think 4th place should get their money back . Making the final 4 is a big deal. I would take the weekly high scorer of $60 and give it to the 4th place finisher. Or, simply take $20 off each of the first 3 finishers.
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
I still think 4th place should get their money back . Making the final 4 is a big deal. I would take the weekly high scorer of $60 and give it to the 4th place finisher. Or, simply take $20 off each of the first 3 finishers.
Originally posted by Tman:
Yea I'm not a fan of the weekly highest score getting paid.
4th getting their money back (reward for making the playoffs) and divide the rest proportionally between top 3 and yearly high scorer sounds good to me.
I'm still on board for $100 buy in too
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:Originally posted by Tman:Yea I'm not a fan of the weekly highest score getting paid.
4th getting their money back (reward for making the playoffs) and divide the rest proportionally between top 3 and yearly high scorer sounds good to me.
I'm still on board for $100 buy in too
This would be my vote. However, whatever you decide to do Rubs is fine with me.
Originally posted by Rubberneck36:I agree. Weekly score is wack imo
Originally posted by krizay:Originally posted by Rubberneck36:I agree. Weekly score is wack imo
Paying a 4th place finisher is whack. If not using for weekly high score use the 4th place money elsewhere.