Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports

Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports


First and Goal: Professor Chaos

May 8, 2015 at 9:56 AM


Videos are auto-populated by an affiliate. This site has no control over the videos that appear above.
Welcome to 'First and Goal'. This week is all about the Draft baby! I'm glad I waited to write this. I've been up, I've been down, I've hated it and now I'm coming around. Before we even get into this draft manifesto I'd just like to commiserate with the rest of you out there. We all know the draft is an inexact science. But if we're going to fail, we at least want to fail with our guys. There's nothing worse than falling in love with a player, only to see him ball out somewhere else. We're all guilty of it. Such is Life. Baalke always takes the smart girl from band class. Sometimes she grows up to be what you thought she was. Other times she grows up to play bass and you want to hug the guy. Where will this class fall? Only time will tell.

As always, be sure to check out our Hero of the Week.

Let's get to it!

Minions, Unite!

Before we get to the picks, I think it's important to flesh out what this draft taught us in regards to Baalke's vision for this team. Honestly, I'm not sure Baalke knows what he's really got. There is a large collection of players returning from injury, there are redshirted players, there are newly signed players and there is the recent draft. This doesn't even take into account the players from last year that didn't play enough, nor does it take into account the players who did play, but are expected to play better under the tutelage of this new coaching staff. There are simply too many unknowns. Baalke's going to throw them all out there and see who rises to the top.

If we paid attention to our GM's comments before the draft, it was obvious that he tried to fill in as many holes as possible through free agency. They might not have been the OL, CB's or ILB's that we wanted, but they were signed. We have bodies everywhere. With that in mind, this was a very, dare I say it, Bill Walsh-ian draft. Cousin Bill would be proud. Early picks went to smart, athletic defensemen while saving later picks for offensive players that we can mold to our system. We're also going into next year tied for the most picks of any team with 9, which doesn't take into account the 2-3 comp picks we're sure to get.

This was also a very Bill Parcells-ian draft, which we should expect by now; building the team from the inside-out. I'm not exactly thrilled with this approach, but it's very effective. We want to be strong up the middle. We want fast, large, tough men to go beat up other men. We want an edge. We want to dominate. Can we say, bludgeon??

If we're going to be fair, we must dock a few points where it's due. I realize we have players like Hyde, McDonald, Patton and Ellington who are going to get a full, fair shake this year, and I'm excited for that. But the last three drafts were full of nice toys, full of nice offensive players from WRs, to RBs to TE's. I have to admit that the collection we managed to get out of all those nice toys is a little underwhelming. Most of the time, we're picking the 15th or the 17th WR in the draft. I don't know how anyone is supposed to pick difference makers using that kind of strategy. For those that say hindsight is 20/20, all I'll say is that we should be doubling-down on our bets. We always have so many picks. We should be drafting a few WR's, RB's and TE's a year. We should be putting the best pieces around Kap as possible. I believe he's a franchise player. Let's get his some freakin' toys!!!

Welcome to the Team, Fellas!

Arik Armstead, DE (6'7"-300): Project! Project! Oh wait, he's automatically our best (prototypical) 3-4 DE on the team. For those who don't think he's going to start, you're still not paying attention. He's going to start opposite Dial on base downs and form a nasty twin-tower combo to set the edge and tie up blockers. That's all we want him to do and it's exactly what we needed. Tank is a nickel DE, not a starting 3-4 DE. I'm putting my money on Tomsula getting this kid ready. He's only scratching the surface. My only complaint is, where are the goddamn leaks coming from? Tighten your ship, Baalke!!

Jaquiski Tartt, SS (6'1"-220): We play Kam Chancellor twice a year, and he has a definite impact on every game. I know Baalke sees the same thing. You think Baalke, a Parcells disciple, likes going to Seattle and getting his butt kicked every year? You think he likes how the seachickens talk smack and out-physical us? No way! We needed tone-setters, and with Willis retiring I can see it. We currently have a logjam at Safety, but as Baalke said, that's not a bad problem to have. I'm guessing Mangini has some ideas on what to do with him in nickel and dime sets. He'll definitely play this year at some point, and more than we might expect at first. He also provides great insurance for Reid, even though I think he's going to be ok. I don't particularly like Ward at nickel back, nor do I think he belongs on the bench. Tricky-tricky for now. Pop Tartt!

Eli Harold, OLB (6'3"- 250): I wanted offense with this pick, but I guess BPA won again. Lots of people like this pick but I don't. We're not letting Aldon go anywhere. Lynch is a stud… so we take another OLB? Maybe our nickel line looks something like this: Harold-Aldon-Dockett-Lynch? Since we're not drafting any CB's I guess this is how you make all the ones you do have look better. I like his tape, I like the value, but I wanted shiny toys for the offense and I was disappointed. I should know better. Anyone who helps demolish the midget is ok in my book.

Blake Bell, TE (6'6"- 250): I really wanted Maxx Williams in the 2nd, I think he's going to be good. I think Bell is ok, but I'm not as high on him as others. He definitely fills a need, and I'm excited to see what he's got. That he can play QB if needed means Baalke loves him. But we passed on players like Ertz and Kelce in the past and took McDonald instead. Now we have Bell instead of Williams. Call me skeptical for now, though I'll be happy to be proved wrong.

Mike Davis, RB (5'9"-220): Lots of other RB's I wanted in this draft besides Davis, but that doesn't mean it's a bad pick. Small, compact, falls forward, can catch out of the backfield… not bad at all. I think he'll do well in a ZBS where he can hide behind our monstrous OL. As long as he stays healthy I'll consider this a good RB2 for Hyde.

DeAndre Smelter, WR (6'2"-225): Not the WR I wanted, and not this early for an ACL project again. Looks to be Boldin's replacement for next year. Tough, physical WR that should mesh well with our run offense. Not excited, but not mad either.

Bradley Pinion, P (6'5"-230): Terrible pick. Why? We already have a good P under contract. On top of that, when compared to who we got last year in the 5th round, Lynch, then it's really not good value. I don't expect him to beat out Lee, but at least he's big, so there's that. C'mon Baalke!

Ian Silberman, OG (6'5"-295): OL depth this late in the draft, more than likely camp fodder. Maybe practice squad potential. Once again, a meat and potatoes draft pick.

Trenton Brown, OT (6'8"-350): More OL depth, though this is a mountain of a man. More practice squad potential, though if he doesn't get poached, I'm excited to see what he can do in 2016. Longest arms on the team I think. Shoulda known.

Rory Anderson, TE (6'5"-245): Talented move TE with a little bit of an injury history. I like how many TE's we picked up. Someone will step up, and with Vernon gone next year, there will be snaps up for grabs.

We picked 10 players you guys! And got more picks for next year! The more picks you have, the greater the chances that some of them become hits. Baalke and Belichick know this more than anybody.

Hero of the Week

We here at 'First and Goal' believe in mankind. We also believe in letting loose and throwing a P-A-R-T-Y! 2015 seems to be a very festive year for the city of Chicago. By all accounts, the draft festivities outside of the actual draft were a hit. So many people came out to see the sights that I doubt NYC ever gets it back; they simply don't have the room to create an NFL village like Chicago and other cities can do. The NFL is all about real-estate, and getting as much of it as they can. This year's draft in Chicago will set a template for all future draft sites. I bet Santa Clara holds a draft in the next 10 years.

But aside from the NFL draft, Chicago is holding another amazing event this year, the final leg of the "Fare-Thee-Well Tour" by the Grateful Dead from July 3-5th. I tried very hard to get tickets but got shut out of mail order. Tear. But I've seen plenty of shows in my day and I'll probably watch the telecast. Chicago will have the biggest party in America over 4th of July weekend, and I suggest that anyone living in Chicago should take themselves to Soldier Field that weekend just to feel the energy and take in the vibe. It's a piece of American history, and it's cool that Chicago got the final shows. The entire area near Soldier Field is expansive and pretty. Not a bad place to see a concert. Our Hero of the Week, the beautiful city of Chicago!

PS: They still have Cutler for a QB, but man are they trying to overcompensate in other areas, and for that Chicago, we salute you!

Andrew Weber-USA TODAY Sports

The opinions within this article are those of the writer and, while just as important, are not necessarily those of the site as a whole.


10 Comments

  • Lucky Phil
    Also, Why can't Baalke get ahead of the curve when constructing a team, choosing draft picks? Four years ago the small quick back (Ray Rice) was en vogue so we drafted L. James in 2011 (2nd rd). Two yrs ago we watched a big back, Eddie Lacy make an impact in the GB offense, so the next yr. we draft C. Hyde in the 2nd rd. This year we watch Seattle come within 2 yrds of winning a second SB with undrafted WR's. Now this year we sign multiple un-drafted wide receivers. I could go on and on. Why is this #@%head following what everyone else is doing in the league. If you always want to be second best, just follow what everyone else is doing. Great formula Baalke! If you haven't noticed Trent the NFC west has gotten significantly better since you and JH took the reigns. I would suggest focusing on the impact player not hoarding draft picks that we can not even play unless we draft injured/ red shirt players. Seattle won a SB because they traded for impact players M. Lynch and Graham this year (Harvin was a $%#$ Up) . They are not afraid of making the big move, are you? You had an option to trade up and get D. Parker, why didn't it get done? Build for the future or Seize The Day!?
    May 11, 2015 at 4:41 PM
    0
  • Lucky Phil
    I'm a little confused why did Baalke and every other GM let L. Collins slide through the draft (ultimately becoming a free agent)? It was publicly known he was going to be questioned in a murder case but none of those reports said he was a suspect. He had a first rd grade. For Baalke drafting injured players because they are under valued and we have no room on a 52 man roster for all these draft picks any way, this opportunity seemed like a golden opportunity for him. If the dude goes to jail, oh well we lost a third rd pick for a potential 1st. Every pick is a risk/ reward scenario. The opportunity to gain a 1st rd talent by losing a 3rd rd. pick was well worth the risk. Also drafting a QB, B. Hundley late, late in the draft is worth the pick, not only because we need a back up. But if a QB realizes his potential unlike most other position players, he maybe traded for a 1st rd pick. I just don't get it, why is Baalke so risk averse by taking a QB or WR in the draft?
    May 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM
    0
  • paul jones
    I like the tart pick and I think armstead can be something special at some point but I still wish baalke would have went with an impact wr near the top of the draft and stop taking on all these "projects". theoretically and realistically we could have traded down twice in the first rd and still grabbed DGB plus had four or five extra picks to waste on "projects". I think niner nation is going to be upset at missing out on that opportunity at some point in the future. that said I hope everything works out like baalke is hoping. GO NINERS!
    May 11, 2015 at 2:09 PM
    0
  • PM
    when did we start running a zone blocking scheme?
    May 10, 2015 at 5:42 PM
    0
  • don
    We are still soft at ILB but the D line is so stout and deep they might be enough to cover any ILB weakness. Same goes for the defensive backfield. I am still concerned about the O line. Joe Staley had a mediocre year and with Iupati gone the whole left side is questionable. If the line bounces back we have the tools to move the ball and score points..
    May 10, 2015 at 6:26 AM
    0
  • Heartfan
    My first take was high irritation with TB' draft - toooo many projects, and the punter, wtf. But the more I looked at the board in each round, I honestly now feel the 9ers were stuck with a bad position and had to take the players they wanted left on the board. With limited talent in each round, the teams above 15 wouldn't trade back, and after that talent was taken, the teams below 15 didn't want to trade up to 15. So when the 9ers picked, they just took what they needed left on the board to some degree - some picks almost look like frustration picks - Bell, Pinnion. Oh well, have a mediocre season (8-8) and you get stuck with a mediocre draft position - you get what you deserve. Bummer for us.
    May 9, 2015 at 9:13 AM
    0
  • WildBill
    Bill Walsh said-for a defense to work, you have to bring in people with talent. On Offense you can get away with lessor talent by scheming well.
    May 8, 2015 at 11:55 AM
    0
  • Stewart
    I generally don't mind the pick of Tartt, even if it is a bit of a reaction to the Grahm trade. I just think that we could have got him later in the draft and it was a bit of a reach, kind of like Ward last year. But I guess that follows suit of TB, he takes the guy he wants and lives with it. I'm not to mad with not taking a CB cause he invested there last year. I think if you look at our drafts in the past, we really only get 1-2 starters per year and the rest are investment picks for the following year. This draft was full of that just like last year.
    May 8, 2015 at 11:31 AM
    0
  • cNiner
    I just want to see how we are going to win with class , and we did not pick up a CB , and would like to see how Jim T deal with the press after losing a few games and losing the NFC west will Trent answer for him? picks all of them suck they might pan out but non of them we need . all of them projects . The only one is RB might get some action TE that was a QB and P in the fifth round and a WR for next year . WOW
    May 8, 2015 at 11:19 AM
    0
  • frank
    I like the Smelter pick...minus the top 3 WRs I didn't see any of the rest stealing snaps from who was already on the team. He has all the tools you want in a WR, just needs to get healthy....if not SF has 9-12 picks next year!
    May 8, 2015 at 10:55 AM
    0

Facebook Comments



More San Francisco 49ers News



Six worst first-round draft picks in 49ers' history

By Marc Adams
Apr 13

It is less than two weeks away from the 2024 NFL Draft, and the San Francisco 49ers finally have a first-round draft pick, after not having one the last two years. Who will they select? Will it be a defensive player? An offensive player? They could use help on the offensive line and in the secondary and defensive line. And they may also have multiple holes to fill a year from now. Either way, the 49ers need to hit on these draft picks, especially in the early rounds, where they haven't always been at their best. John Lynch and Kyle Shanahan have some first-round misses, like DT Solomon Thomas and LB Rueben Foster. But are those the worst first-round picks in team history? Neither made this list, though some will argue that Thomas should be on it, mainly because he was taken



49ers address both sides of the ball in Kiper and Yates 3-round mock draft

By David Bonilla
Apr 15

We're just 10 days away from the start of the 2024 NFL Draft. While many gain more confidence about their projections for the top of the first round, the picture of what might happen further down remains murky. Most predict the San Francisco 49ers will use their first selection, No. 31 overall, on an offensive lineman. However, an early run on the position may alter those plans. The 49ers may address another position, or they may have to move up to secure a top prospect. ESPN's Mel Kiper Jr. and Field Yates recently revealed a joint three-round mock draft, examining the top 100 selections and forecasting



Schrager mock draft has 49ers adding 'universally liked and respected' receiver

By David Bonilla
Apr 16

With only nine days remaining until the start of the 2024 NFL Draft, Good Morning Football's Peter Schrager revealed his first mock draft of the year. While most might expect the San Francisco 49ers to target an offensive lineman, Schrager has the team bolstering its wide receiver corps with an SEC talent. Schrager has the 49ers using the No. 31 overall pick to select former Georgia wide receiver Ladd McConkey, whose 2023 campaign with the Bulldogs was limited by back and ankle injuries. "McConkey in the first round? Yes," Schrager wrote. "Above guys like Troy Franklin and Keon Coleman? Perhaps. I've spoken to a



Draft Watch: 49ers hosting Sione Vaki and Kingsley Suamataia

By David Bonilla
Apr 16

The San Francisco 49ers are hosting several draft prospects today and tomorrow as the deadline for pre-draft visits draws near. Among the players visiting the team's facilities are former Utah safety Sione Vaki and former BYU tackle Kingsley Suamataia. Antioch native Sione Vaki (and many others) are having their pre-draft visit with the 49ers today. pic.twitter.com/q3UoLoWD1W— Steph Sanchez (@Steph49K) April 16,


Latest

More by Phil Walsh

More Articles

Share 49ersWebzone