San Francisco Warriors or Golden State? | Page 2

Mar 22, 2017 at 2:05 PM

#16

Dr_Bill_Walsh
Veteran
Posts: 20,126

San Francisco Pride

"Warriors" is too violent for the PC/Safe Space Capital of the Word

Mascot:

Mar 22, 2017 at 4:26 PM

#17

4ML
Veteran
Posts: 51,574

Golden State Warriors of San Francisco Bay Area

Mar 23, 2017 at 3:18 PM

#18

Niners99
Veteran
Posts: 43,183

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Thanks 99. Not a hockey fan, but those are awful too.

IMO the Warriors uniforms are the best in the NBA, but I agree that they should remove the team name from the logo.

Mar 23, 2017 at 4:15 PM

#19

Jiks
Member
Posts: 29,220

Northern Cali Flukes

Mar 29, 2017 at 11:36 AM

#20

bayarealuv
Veteran
Posts: 56,843

i wouldn't be mad if they changed it to SF.. but I doubt they do anyway.. golden state foreva evaaa

Mar 29, 2017 at 12:30 PM

#21

Fanaticofnfl
Veteran
Posts: 18,248

Originally posted by Jiks:
Northern Cali Flukes

One unlucky Game 7 Finals loss and suddenly they're a fluke.

You haters are so cute lmao

Mar 29, 2017 at 2:15 PM

#22

Jiks
Member
Posts: 29,220

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by Jiks:
Northern Cali Flukes

One unlucky Game 7 Finals loss and suddenly they're a fluke.

You haters are so cute lmao

Well I listen to everybody saying "I'm not sure if GS can win without KD", so if that's the case, they obviouslt aren't championship caliber without him. Sooo, the team that won it 2 years ago isn't good enough without KD apparently.

Sounds like a fluke to me. Winning a chip, but needing an MVP candidate to sign to win another? If they weren't a fluke, why sign KD in the first place?

[ Edited by Jiks on Mar 29, 2017 at 2:17 PM ]

Mar 29, 2017 at 2:21 PM

#23

Morgy
Hey bud, what’s your problem?
Posts: 29,673

Originally posted by Bluesbro:
Go back to 'The City' ... always thought that looked good.

I didn't like the uni's from 97' to 2010. And that Thunder mascot...

Mar 29, 2017 at 2:39 PM

#24

bayarealuv
Veteran
Posts: 56,843

Originally posted by Morgan49:
I didn't like the uni's from 97' to 2010. And that Thunder mascot...

yeah it's not great lol.. but it was when I started really following the dubs.. so it's my favorite

Mar 29, 2017 at 2:41 PM

#25

Fanaticofnfl
Veteran
Posts: 18,248

Originally posted by Jiks:
Well I listen to everybody saying "I'm not sure if GS can win without KD", so if that's the case, they obviouslt aren't championship caliber without him. Sooo, the team that won it 2 years ago isn't good enough without KD apparently.

Sounds like a fluke to me. Winning a chip, but needing an MVP candidate to sign to win another? If they weren't a fluke, why sign KD in the first place?

First of all, KD didn't just join a 73-win team. We basically traded in half the quality of our bench to get him. Playing without him right now definitely isn't the same as last year's Warriors team (or the year before).

Second of all, they added him to get better overall, which they are when he's healthy. Even if you're good, if you have an opportunity to get better, you always take it, even if you've just won the chip. See the Patriots over the past month as a prime example