Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by 4ML:
Bucks have Sanders and Henson...it will be surprising if they go after Embiid. They need a perimeter player badly. Unless they have rated Embiid a lot higher than Wiggins and Parker...to me it makes no sense.
I hear you but I dont think Sanders would get in the way of taking Embiid. I still like Parker the best though.
Bucks gave Sanders 4 year $11M a year ext. before the start of the season. Henson is playing great. They've a lot of money tied up with Ilyasova as well. It's not just personnel...it makes less sense financially as well.
But yea...if they love Embiid...then I can see it. If they add Parker...they can be pretty decent instantly.
I am still under the impression that Embiid is talented but so raw. I dont get the Olojawan comparisons myself. I agree 100% that Parker makes the most sense for the Bucks.
Serious Question, have you watched Embiid play this year?