Originally posted by crzy:
Fitz is average. He is nothing special; easily replaceable.. But he isn't the complete assault on the ears that some warriors fans make him out to be.
Im a huge fan of Barnett but he might be getting replaced by Tolbert who I also like a lot
Fitzgerald is a smarmy little p***k who backstabbed Papa to get that job back in the mid-90s...that's why there is zero emotion/chemistry when those two do the little post-game "toss" between the CSN studio show with Papa and Fitz/Barnett at the game.
As for Barnett and Tolbert, man I hope that's not true, although wouldn't be surprised if they did some s*** like the A's have done where they pull Ray Fosse off TV for a few games at a time and bring in Scott Hatteberg.
I don't care too much for Tolbert's radio show, but he is decent as a game analyst...but I don't think he's nearly as good as Barnett, and although Barnett is older, he's still sharp as a tack, understands the "modern" game, and has way too much in the tank to put him out pasture just yet. Hopefully he's around a few more years and can be a part of the Warriors "resurgence"...but when he does go, Tolbert would be a good replacement.