Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Garnett was never the same after his knee injury in '09. (where he missed the playoffs) And they came within inches of the title in '10.
do you believe he is an elite coach?
No, but I think he's a good one, and slightly better than the other guys that are available like Karl & Hollins.
George Karl has never had the talent that Rivers won with in Boston. I think he is just as good a coach if not better than Rivers
His Seattle teams were more talented than the team that Doc won with in Boston, IMO. Karl's teams almost always underperform in the playoffs. I don't think the difference between the two is huge or anything, but I'd definitely go with Rivers.
Rivers didnt have to coach against Michael Jordan in the finals either. I would go with Karl every time. Guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
Originally posted by FL9er:
LOL, George Karl is a B coach. He's Tony Dungy. Nothing wrong with that, but I don't think you can win a title with him as your coach. JMO.
I would laugh so hard if Chris Paul still bailed, but I don't see it happening. He and Howard want to play together, but they both want to play in LA? How is that achievable?
Chris Broussard sucks.
Yea...I think Doc is clearly better. Good move by the Clippers. IMO, that team is going to get better just with an addition of Doc. When CP3 resigns, they need to trade Bledsoe and get someone who can play 35 minutes a game at SG or SF.
This fan site is dedicated to the 49ers and their fans. It is in no way affiliated with the NFL or any of its teams. All teams and players mentioned on this site are registered trademarks of the NFL. The use of any team names, words, trademarks, logos or photos have been used for descriptive purposes only. The content and information from other sites is the property of their respective owners. Player and team photos used with permission from USA TODAY Sports Images.