Originally posted by Frisco69ers:Jimmer isnt a d*ckhead like Cousins is. Do you see Jimmer complaining about his contract or playing time? NO
Do you see Jimmer being good at basketball? No lol
There are 281 users in the forums
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:Jimmer isnt a d*ckhead like Cousins is. Do you see Jimmer complaining about his contract or playing time? NO
Originally posted by marshniners24:lol this
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Jimmer isnt a d*ckhead like Cousins is. Do you see Jimmer complaining about his contract or playing time? NO
Do you see Jimmer being good at basketball? No lol
Originally posted by marshniners24:
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Jimmer isnt a d*ckhead like Cousins is. Do you see Jimmer complaining about his contract or playing time? NO
Do you see Jimmer being good at basketball? No lol
Originally posted by pdizo916:
tim hardaway jr would be a nice pick up with a second 1st round pick.
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
tim hardaway jr would be a nice pick up with a second 1st round pick.
yep b/c SG is a big need for us
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
tim hardaway jr would be a nice pick up with a second 1st round pick.
yep b/c SG is a big need for us
You don't draft for need in the draft...
TROLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
tim hardaway jr would be a nice pick up with a second 1st round pick.
yep b/c SG is a big need for us
You don't draft for need in the draft...
TROLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
or yeah? just take the BPA? Tell that to the Blazers after they took Oden
Originally posted by pdizo916:
noooooo....they went for need rather BPA. Durant was clearly the healthier/better player but Oden fit their need and had potential to become the next great big man. Plus the blazers had Roy so they didn't feel they needed Durant as much as a big man who could protect the basket.
Thank you for proving my point, doe. If the Blazers would've selected Durant, and Durant was still on the team, the Trailblazers would be a serious team in the West. Not the current OKC or spurs team, but a top 4 seed in the west. As far as your sarcastic comment, you also draft for the future-2015-2016. Right now, the kings may not need a SG right now, but after the high turnover this team is going to see, it's smart to keep as much talent as possible while the team tinkers their current roster.
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
tim hardaway jr would be a nice pick up with a second 1st round pick.
yep b/c SG is a big need for us
You don't draft for need in the draft...
TROLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
or yeah? just take the BPA? Tell that to the Blazers after they took Oden
noooooo....they went for need rather BPA. Durant was clearly the healthier/better player but Oden fit their need and had potential to become the next great big man. Plus the blazers had Roy so they didn't feel they needed Durant as much as a big man who could protect the basket.
Thank you for proving my point, doe. If the Blazers would've selected Durant, and Durant was still on the team, the Trailblazers would be a serious team in the West. Not the current OKC or spurs team, but a top 4 seed in the west. As far as your sarcastic comment, you also draft for the future-2015-2016. Right now, the kings may not need a SG right now, but after the high turnover this team is going to see, it's smart to keep as much talent as possible while the team tinkers their current roster.
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
tim hardaway jr would be a nice pick up with a second 1st round pick.
yep b/c SG is a big need for us
You don't draft for need in the draft...
TROLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
or yeah? just take the BPA? Tell that to the Blazers after they took Oden
noooooo....they went for need rather BPA. Durant was clearly the healthier/better player but Oden fit their need and had potential to become the next great big man. Plus the blazers had Roy so they didn't feel they needed Durant as much as a big man who could protect the basket.
Thank you for proving my point, doe. If the Blazers would've selected Durant, and Durant was still on the team, the Trailblazers would be a serious team in the West. Not the current OKC or spurs team, but a top 4 seed in the west. As far as your sarcastic comment, you also draft for the future-2015-2016. Right now, the kings may not need a SG right now, but after the high turnover this team is going to see, it's smart to keep as much talent as possible while the team tinkers their current roster.
at the time of the draft Oden was considered the cant miss #1 prospect, best C in 7-10 years. The pick wasnt need, but on BPA. No one said Durant is better than him leading up to the draft, dont fool yourself.
Originally posted by Frisco69ers:
or yeah? just take the BPA? Tell that to the Blazers after they took Oden