There are 128 users in the forums

204X NBA Champs Sacramento Kings Thread

Jul 9, 2013 at 4:47 PM
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Can an NBA team succeed by starting 4 SG's and Cousins? Stay tuned to find out.

lmao

Vasquez is a legit PG and SHOULD start over Thomas.

Thornton, Monta, McLemore, Jimmer, Cousins. Come get some.

Maybe the NBA is considering playing with multiple balls and Vivek is a genius.

Relax man. Offseason ain't over. This isn't going to be a playoff year. They are starting with the village idiot's scraps. The roster will look different. Don't judge the FO or team based on this year's wins and losses. It ain't right homes
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by marshniners24:
I support the Ellis signing cause it means we have to get rid of Thornton/salmons/Jimmer/Hayes

So getting rid of Salmons and adding Monta helps our SF spot how?
Get rid of his contact. And Ellis is better than Thornton and Jimmer. Good point Marsh. If we get rid of those three horrendous contracts. I don't give a s**t about Jimmer at this point.
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by marshniners24:
I support the Ellis signing cause it means we have to get rid of Thornton/salmons/Jimmer/Hayes

So getting rid of Salmons and adding Monta helps our SF spot how?

Lol how does having salmons help our SF spot in the first place?
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:54 PM
Originally posted by sacniner:
Get rid of his contact. And Ellis is better than Thornton and Jimmer. Good point Marsh. If we get rid of those three horrendous contracts. I don't give a s**t about Jimmer at this point.

Getting rid of an expiring contract in order to get a cap clogging multi year deal for Monta sounds smart?
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:55 PM
Originally posted by InconvenienTTruth21:
29 wins

not even
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:56 PM
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Getting rid of an expiring contract in order to get a cap clogging multi year deal for Monta sounds smart?

This. If Monta lands a 4 year deal at $10+ mil per, it would be the worst contract in basketball hands down. Monta is fools gold. He's a 6th man scorer. Not a featured star.
[ Edited by SofaKing on Jul 9, 2013 at 4:56 PM ]
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:57 PM
Originally posted by SofaKing:
This. If Monta lands a 4 year deal at $10+ mil per, it would be the worst contract in basketball hands down. Monta is fools gold. He's a 6th man scorer. Not a featured star.

Well luckily he'd be a 6th man here
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by sacniner:
Get rid of his contact. And Ellis is better than Thornton and Jimmer. Good point Marsh. If we get rid of those three horrendous contracts. I don't give a s**t about Jimmer at this point.

Getting rid of an expiring contract in order to get a cap clogging multi year deal for Monta sounds smart?

It'll be a three year deal. From 10 to 12. If you get rid of Thornton, Hayes and Salmons it won't be cap clogging. Plus, even though people don't like his style, he is a good NBA player. We don't really have that besides DMC at this point. Its a good signing if we move those other s**t contracts.

Give me what you would do, realistically, as the arm chair GM of the kings. Keep in mind NO starting calibur player wants to sign here. Would you keep things exactly the same? What would you do? Its not easy.
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM
Originally posted by marshniners24:
Originally posted by SofaKing:
This. If Monta lands a 4 year deal at $10+ mil per, it would be the worst contract in basketball hands down. Monta is fools gold. He's a 6th man scorer. Not a featured star.

Well luckily he'd be a 6th man here

Probably, but at what salary? If he gets the kind of money he wants, its a bad deal.
Jul 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM
Originally posted by sacniner:
It'll be a three year deal. From 10 to 12. If you get rid of Thornton, Hayes and Salmons it won't be cap clogging. Plus, even though people don't like his style, he is a good NBA player. We don't really have that besides DMC at this point. Its a good signing if we move those other s**t contracts.

Give me what you would do, realistically, as the arm chair GM of the kings. Keep in mind NO starting calibur player wants to sign here. Would you keep things exactly the same? What would you do? Its not easy.

This

Jul 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Getting rid of an expiring contract in order to get a cap clogging multi year deal for Monta sounds smart?

This. If Monta lands a 4 year deal at $10+ mil per, it would be the worst contract in basketball hands down. Monta is fools gold. He's a 6th man scorer. Not a featured star.

There is a lot of bad ones. NBA players are paid a lot. Its not bad if you get rid of those three I mentioned. On a three year deal. Thornton gets paid 8+ and no one outside of Sac thinks he is better than Monta.
Jul 9, 2013 at 5:00 PM
Originally posted by sacniner:
It'll be a three year deal. From 10 to 12. If you get rid of Thornton, Hayes and Salmons it won't be cap clogging. Plus, even though people don't like his style, he is a good NBA player. We don't really have that besides DMC at this point. Its a good signing if we move those other s**t contracts.

Give me what you would do, realistically, as the arm chair GM of the kings. Keep in mind NO starting calibur player wants to sign here. Would you keep things exactly the same? What would you do? Its not easy.

LOL GLWT. I can almost promise it won't be 3 years either.
Jul 9, 2013 at 5:00 PM
Originally posted by marshniners24:
Well luckily he'd be a 6th man here

No way they are signing him to be a 6th man. At least not this season. They either see him as the starting 1 or 2 with either Greives or Mclemore. Teams don't pay that kind of money to a 6th man. I'd guess they don't plan on starting the rookie yet.
[ Edited by TTown9ers on Jul 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM ]
Jul 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by sacniner:
It'll be a three year deal. From 10 to 12. If you get rid of Thornton, Hayes and Salmons it won't be cap clogging. Plus, even though people don't like his style, he is a good NBA player. We don't really have that besides DMC at this point. Its a good signing if we move those other s**t contracts.

Give me what you would do, realistically, as the arm chair GM of the kings. Keep in mind NO starting calibur player wants to sign here. Would you keep things exactly the same? What would you do? Its not easy.

LOL GLWT. I can almost promise it won't be 3 years either.

Lol, why are you promising that? you pulled that out of your ass. The reports are three years man. This is a new CBA. The contracts are shorter.

Nice solutions man... Good luck with your plan
Jul 9, 2013 at 5:06 PM
Originally posted by sacniner:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by sacniner:
It'll be a three year deal. From 10 to 12. If you get rid of Thornton, Hayes and Salmons it won't be cap clogging. Plus, even though people don't like his style, he is a good NBA player. We don't really have that besides DMC at this point. Its a good signing if we move those other s**t contracts.

Give me what you would do, realistically, as the arm chair GM of the kings. Keep in mind NO starting calibur player wants to sign here. Would you keep things exactly the same? What would you do? Its not easy.

LOL GLWT. I can almost promise it won't be 3 years either.

Lol, why are you promising that? you pulled that out of your ass. The reports are three years man. This is a new CBA. The contracts are shorter.

Nice solutions man... Good luck with your plan

Oh and the reports are also that the Kings will be able to unload Thornton, Salmons, and Hayes for free? That is splendid news.

And Ellis turned down a 3 year $36M extension already. But yeah you are right, he's gonna settle for less.
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Threads
×
Share 49ersWebzone