Originally posted by sacniner:
Originally posted by SacRock14:
Originally posted by sacniner:
Dude hasn't gotten an oppurtunity on this s**t, selfish team. He shows improvement and flashes. And he did get shafted here. He is at least as good as Thornton if he got the same oppurtunities.
Whoa. I know you dislike Thornton, but do you really believe that?
Maybe, if he got the same oppurtunity Thornton got. Remember when Thornton came here? He played less then ten min a game with NO. Averaged less then eight. Once they actually ran plays for him and he was encouraged to score, he proved that he can score in bunches. You just never know until you give an NBA two guard that freedom. Almost all two guards that make it to the NBA can score if they have plays designed for them and don't have to worry about being pulled from the game if they miss a few. That doesn't necessarily translate to wins, but a lot of these guys can score. Jimmer can shoot, that is why he is in the NBA. He also improved on those runners and floaters. If he had the confidence of his team and coaching staff, had plays designed for him, and got consistent minutes I think he can score in bunches like Thornton.
I'm not sure how efficient he would be though. Like Thornton, I think he would be a streaky scorer.
I agree that Jimmer would benefit from a greater opportunity (who wouldn't). But he's nowhere close to the scorer Thornton is, IMO. Thornton is a guy you can put on an island and he'll make something happen. Jimmer's problem is he needs help to create open looks. He can't beat defenders off the dribble and really has no counter moves if his initial move is stopped. Not as strong as Marcus, can't score around the basket as well as Marcus. As a spot up shooter, yeah, he can be lights out.
I'm not dead set on moving Jimmer, but if a guard is drafted at #7, something has got to give. If we can move Jimmer for a late first-rounder and our new management can handpick another player that fits their model, I'm all for it.