2012-13 General NBA Discussion Thread | Page 137

Originally posted by marshniners24:

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Please based god so he doesn't go to the kings

Monta gonna avg 40 points against Sac and GSW

Originally posted by valrod33:
Monta and Howard are homo for each other and want to play with each other if Paul and Howard doesnt workout

this. Monta in that system would dominate.

Jun 17, 2013 at 3:31 PM

#2045

LA9erFan
Veteran
Posts: 66,021

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Lakers can't do a sign & trade because they're in luxury tax territory. Broussard's an extremely lazy reporter.

Jun 17, 2013 at 3:32 PM

#2046

LumpiaJeff
Veteran
Posts: 51,506

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Lakers can't do a sign & trade because they're in luxury tax territory. Broussard's an extremely lazy reporter.

lol Broussard gon' Garce

Jun 17, 2013 at 4:31 PM

#2047

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Lakers can't do a sign & trade because they're in luxury tax territory. Broussard's an extremely lazy reporter.

lol Broussard gon' Garce

lol

Jun 17, 2013 at 4:39 PM

#2048

4ML
Veteran
Posts: 51,574

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Lakers can't do a sign & trade because they're in luxury tax territory. Broussard's an extremely lazy reporter.

So, Lakers can't do sign & trade involving Dwight either?

Jun 17, 2013 at 5:12 PM

#2049

LA9erFan
Veteran
Posts: 66,021

Originally posted by 49ersMyLife:

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Lakers can't do a sign & trade because they're in luxury tax territory. Broussard's an extremely lazy reporter.

So, Lakers can't do sign & trade involving Dwight either?

I should have been more clear. They can't receive a player via sign & trade. They could sign & trade Dwight elsewhere, provided that none of the players that they received in return were signed & traded.

Jun 17, 2013 at 5:18 PM

#2050

9erReign
StonksKing
Posts: 49,367

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by 49ersMyLife:

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Lakers can't do a sign & trade because they're in luxury tax territory. Broussard's an extremely lazy reporter.

So, Lakers can't do sign & trade involving Dwight either?

I should have been more clear. They can't receive a player via sign & trade. They could sign & trade Dwight elsewhere, provided that none of the players that they received in return were signed & traded.

How do they define sign and trade? So if say Milwaukee signs Monta to an extension, then happens to trade him to the Lakers like 5 days later is that allowed?

Jun 17, 2013 at 6:06 PM

#2051

marshulk
Veteran
Posts: 45,242

Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by 49ersMyLife:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Lakers can't do a sign & trade because they're in luxury tax territory. Broussard's an extremely lazy reporter.

So, Lakers can't do sign & trade involving Dwight either?

I should have been more clear. They can't receive a player via sign & trade. They could sign & trade Dwight elsewhere, provided that none of the players that they received in return were signed & traded.

How do they define sign and trade? So if say Milwaukee signs Monta to an extension, then happens to trade him to the Lakers like 5 days later is that allowed?

Pretty sure there's an amount of time that has to go by before a player gets traded after recieving an extension unless its a sign and trade

Jun 17, 2013 at 6:23 PM

#2052

4ML
Veteran
Posts: 51,574

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by 49ersMyLife:

Originally posted by LA9erFan:

Originally posted by SF69ers:
Rumors that a sign and trade involving Monta to the Lakers for Pau Gasol

Lakers can't do a sign & trade because they're in luxury tax territory. Broussard's an extremely lazy reporter.

So, Lakers can't do sign & trade involving Dwight either?

I should have been more clear. They can't receive a player via sign & trade. They could sign & trade Dwight elsewhere, provided that none of the players that they received in return were signed & traded.

Gotcha.

Jun 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM

#2053

LA9erFan
Veteran
Posts: 66,021

Originally posted by 9erReign:
How do they define sign and trade? So if say Milwaukee signs Monta to an extension, then happens to trade him to the Lakers like 5 days later is that allowed?

Technically, an extension means that a player is under contract for the upcoming year, so if Monta extended his contract, it would mean that he decided to opt in to the final year of his current deal. In that case, Monta could be traded to the Lakers this offseason. (he's said he's opting out though)

If Monta were to opt out, become an Unrestricted Free Agent, and then re-sign with Milwaukee, he could not be traded anywhere until January 15th, 2014.

Jun 17, 2013 at 7:10 PM

#2054

StOnEy333
Hall of Fame
Posts: 99,663

Pete dropping knowledge.

Jun 17, 2013 at 7:13 PM

#2055

LA9erFan
Veteran
Posts: 66,021

Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Pete dropping knowledge.

Ya, knowing the exact date when a re-signed NBA player can be traded has a lot of practical uses in my life. You should see how the panties fly when I explain revenue sharing.