There are 91 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

2013 San Francisco Giants Thread

hhhhuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu flannery
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Nice going Flannery could've had 2nd and 3rd with 0 outs

It's not like Buster is fast f**king stupid

And then Pence swings 3-0

I didn't get that either. If there were two outs, that's a gamble that should be taken, with no outs Posey should have been held at 3rd
Oh stop blaming flannery. Kuip is right- it took an absolute perfect relay and he was only out by a couple inches.
Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
Oh stop blaming flannery. Kuip is right- it took an absolute perfect relay and he was only out by a couple inches.

He should be blamed because there were no outs. We would have had runners on 2nd and 3rd with no outs with Pence and Belt coming up.

If there were two outs, then he shouldn't be blamed one bit but that just wasn't the case.
[ Edited by sfgiantdave on Jul 21, 2013 at 2:58 PM ]
Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
Oh stop blaming flannery. Kuip is right- it took an absolute perfect relay and he was only out by a couple inches.

Absolutely no reason to send him with the five and six hitters coming up.
Belt 1 pitch fail.
1 run over 7 innings and Bum's gonna take the loss what a joke
Hindsight is always 20/20.
Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
Hindsight is always 20/20.

Not when there is 0 outs.

With no outs, you got to be conservative, with two outs, you take more chances
[ Edited by sfgiantdave on Jul 21, 2013 at 3:08 PM ]
Originally posted by sfgiantdave:
Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
Hindsight is always 20/20.

Not when there is 0 outs.

With no outs, you got to be conservative, with two outs, you take more chances

Bingo.
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Originally posted by sfgiantdave:
Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
Hindsight is always 20/20.

Not when there is 0 outs.

With no outs, you got to be conservative, with two outs, you take more chances

Bingo.

+1
NEWS FROM MLBTR

While Affeldt's injury may change the
calculus slightly, Baggarly, within that same
article, sees the Giants continuing their quest
for starting pitching. Manager Bruce
Bochy loves Jake Peavy , but the two teams
have not discussed a deal and the
Giants don't have the quantity or quality of
trade chips to get a seat at the table,
according to Baggarly.

Ex- Giants closer Brian Wilson is expected to
begin showcasing his arm for teams within
the next few weeks and the Giants have
asked Wilson's representative to include
them in the process, reports

Schulman . Wilson underwent his second
Tommy John surgery 15 month ago.
No thanks to Jake Peavy
Originally posted by sfgiantdave:
Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
Hindsight is always 20/20.

Not when there is 0 outs.

With no outs, you got to be conservative, with two outs, you take more chances

Looking back on it, it would've been probably more wise to hold up. However, especially with how our offense has been lately (and with Pence struggling) Flannery decided to put the pressure on the defense. Posey is probably safe 9/10 times on that play because it was a picture perfect relay all the way from the OF playing it perfectly off the wall. Things just haven't gone our way all day today.
Originally posted by OregonDuckNiner:
No thanks to Jake Peavy

I disagree Jake Peavy is only signed through next season and will not be blocking any of our pitching prospects. In fact this would be a decent stop gap until our pitching prospects are ready. With that said, I wouldn't give up Susac, Williamson or any of our lower minor league pitching prospects to get him.

On the other hand if a Gary Brown and Heath Hembree trade package gets it done, I would pull the trigger.
[ Edited by sfgiantdave on Jul 21, 2013 at 3:35 PM ]
Get the Latest News at Giants365.com