There are 118 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

2013 San Francisco Giants Thread

Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by SFrush:
Gallardo is better than both of them. It's a bonus he's under control another 2 years.

I didnt say he wasnt better. He also would cost a lot more in terms of what it would take to get him and how much he makes.

You said you think Norris and Nolasco are better options. They may be cheaper options, but they're not better options.

Finally signs of life offensively.
For the record I would take Gallardo in a second. Any package would likely have to start with Crick though.
Originally posted by Hopper:
For the record I would take Gallardo in a second. Any package would likely have to start with Crick though.

Yes. Crick and a lot more.
Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by SFrush:
Gallardo is better than both of them. It's a bonus he's under control another 2 years.

I didnt say he wasnt better. He also would cost a lot more in terms of what it would take to get him and how much he makes.

You said you think Norris and Nolasco are better options. They may be cheaper options, but they're not better options.

I said they are better options because of what it would take to get them vs. Gallardo and their contracts. Lots of guys would be better options if you want to give up your farm system for them.
bochy, y u no suicide squeeze
Originally posted by Hopper:
For the record I would take Gallardo in a second. Any package would likely have to start with Crick though.

if sabs traded wheeler, don't think that crick is untradable, its very possible. i would love gallardo or cliff lee though
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Originally posted by Hopper:
For the record I would take Gallardo in a second. Any package would likely have to start with Crick though.

if sabs traded wheeler, don't think that crick is untradable, its very possible. i would love gallardo or cliff lee though
I don't. Getting Gallardo for two and half seasons is very tempting. Sure as heck beats giving up our top pitching prospect for a rental.
are you effin serious scutaro, ARGH
Stupid play by scuts knowing the situation
i swear, we find new ways not to score all the time lately
That wudve been a run and a tied game
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Originally posted by SFrush:
Gallardo is better than both of them. It's a bonus he's under control another 2 years.

I didnt say he wasnt better. He also would cost a lot more in terms of what it would take to get him and how much he makes.

You said you think Norris and Nolasco are better options. They may be cheaper options, but they're not better options.

I said they are better options because of what it would take to get them vs. Gallardo and their contracts. Lots of guys would be better options if you want to give up your farm system for them.
I know what you meant which is why I called them cheaper options as well.
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Stupid play by scuts knowing the situation

i understand being greedy when its a tie game but we losing LOL , atleast give your guy a chance for a fly out run score with 1 out, now with 2 outs you need a hit, smh.
Originally posted by Muggins:
In other words you have nothing important to add.
Get the Latest News at Giants365.com