Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by GhostofFredDean74:
Of all his pitches, he seems to command the fastball the best...but when that goes, he loses it pretty quickly and the other stuff goes too. His fastball is definitely electric, but it's also pretty straight, so he might be better trading speed for movement. Again, he's the closest thing I've seen to Zach Wheeler in our system, and I mean that in both the good (stuff) and bad (lack of control).
I've always like Blackburn over Crick because Blackburn's overall command. That's why I was in favor of that Beltran for Wheeler trade at that time. Wheeler has dynamite stuff but his control issues were problematic. The only problem I have with the beltran trade today was that the G's probably could've gotten more in return than Beltran who was on the last year of his contract.
If I had to make a bet on which pitcher gets to the bigs first and stays longer, I'd go with Blackburn. Stuff-wise, there's no comparison since Crick has the classic "stuff" you want to see in a potential #1 or #2. But Blackburn is the kind of guy who can pitch 10-12 years in the majors because he actually knows HOW to pitch, regardless of his stuff.
Now, to be clear, I do think Wheeler is/was a much better prospect than Crick and I'm sure everyone would agree with that. I was mostly comparing their stuff and their lack of control from what I saw of them both here in SJ. They're eerily similar in those areas...which does make me think that the reason Sabes was willing to part with Wheeler was his concern about his lack of control (or that they had just drafted Crick and felt they had someone similar in the fold). At the end of the day, if you can't locate your pitches properly, it doesn't matter how good your stuff is, major league hitters will pummel you. Which is what might've made Wheeler expendable in Sabean's eyes.
And, which is why I really, really like Blackburn (and I'd thrown in Edwin Escobar too).
[ Edited by GhostofFredDean74 on Apr 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM ]