There are 171 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

Introducing NBA-Scouting.info; Staff needed

I would be interested but I have very s**tty grammar.
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
newest blog entry.

SacRock's Initial Power Rankings: http://www.nba-scouting.info/articles.php?id=5

wack
T-Wolves are number 1

[ Edited by valrod33 on Oct 12, 2010 at 22:03:48 ]
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
newest blog entry.

SacRock's Initial Power Rankings: http://www.nba-scouting.info/articles.php?id=5

wack
T-Wolves are number 1

lol, sorry Val. Clearly, I'm a little biased, with the Kings at #19.
Originally posted by SacRock14:
Originally posted by valrod33:
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
newest blog entry.

SacRock's Initial Power Rankings: http://www.nba-scouting.info/articles.php?id=5

wack
T-Wolves are number 1

lol, sorry Val. Clearly, I'm a little biased, with the Kings at #19.

  • jrg
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 111,242
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
newest blog entry.

SacRock's Initial Power Rankings: http://www.nba-scouting.info/articles.php?id=5

Bulls, Mavericks, Blazers ahead of the Magic?
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
newest blog entry.

SacRock's Initial Power Rankings: http://www.nba-scouting.info/articles.php?id=5

Bulls, Mavericks, Blazers ahead of the Magic?

Yes. I just see Vince and Shard continuing to decline. Nelson needs to stay healthy. Definitely good enough to be a top 4 team in the East.

I think the Bulls and Blazers are better all-around teams. The Mavericks, like I said in the article, aren't championship contenders but they have a talented roster that will win a lot of (meaningless) regular season games.
  • 4ML
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 28,488
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
newest blog entry.

SacRock's Initial Power Rankings: http://www.nba-scouting.info/articles.php?id=5

Bulls, Mavericks, Blazers ahead of the Magic?

Bulls are looking real good (unless Boozer becomes injury prone again) and Blazers are likely going to be the no.2 seed in the West. Mavs - ehh! I think Magic are better than Mavs.
  • jrg
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 111,242
Originally posted by SacRock14:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
newest blog entry.

SacRock's Initial Power Rankings: http://www.nba-scouting.info/articles.php?id=5

Bulls, Mavericks, Blazers ahead of the Magic?

Yes. I just see Vince and Shard continuing to decline. Nelson needs to stay healthy. Definitely good enough to be a top 4 team in the East.

I think the Bulls and Blazers are better all-around teams. The Mavericks, like I said in the article, aren't championship contenders but they have a talented roster that will win a lot of (meaningless) regular season games.

Lol, to each their own.

Only teams I'd put ahead of Orlando is the Lakers, Heat, and Celtics.
  • jrg
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 111,242
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by SacRock14:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by AB83Rules:
newest blog entry.

SacRock's Initial Power Rankings: http://www.nba-scouting.info/articles.php?id=5

Bulls, Mavericks, Blazers ahead of the Magic?

Yes. I just see Vince and Shard continuing to decline. Nelson needs to stay healthy. Definitely good enough to be a top 4 team in the East.

I think the Bulls and Blazers are better all-around teams. The Mavericks, like I said in the article, aren't championship contenders but they have a talented roster that will win a lot of (meaningless) regular season games.

Lol, to each their own.

Only teams I'd put ahead of Orlando is the Lakers, Heat, and Celtics.

Maybe not even Miami. I'm not buying into the hype yet.
Warriors at #16? Wowzers. That might be more of a than Orlando being so far down.
Oh well, all in fun.
Originally posted by SacRock14:
Oh well, all in fun.

Just like every single other power ranking out there. It's just one person's opinion.
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Warriors at #16? Wowzers. That might be more of a than Orlando being so far down.

I think the Warriors as the 9th seed in the West isn't too far fetched. The thing with the West is, you could make a case for a lot of those teams near the No. 6-10 mark (Denver, Phoenix, GSW, Memphis, Houston, New Orleans, LAC). IMO, they could all flip flop.
Originally posted by SacRock14:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Warriors at #16? Wowzers. That might be more of a than Orlando being so far down.

I think the Warriors as the 9th seed in the West isn't too far fetched. The thing with the West is, you could make a case for a lot of those teams near the No. 6-10 mark (Denver, Phoenix, GSW, Memphis, Houston, New Orleans, LAC). IMO, they could all flip flop.

Much like the niners, the warriors are going to have to prove they aren't a bottom feeder before I'll ever give them their dues.
bump;

http://www.nba-scouting.info/2010-rosters.php

Our Roster and Salaries section.

Players will be tagged FREE AGENTS when released.