There are 58 users in the forums

Remember
Not a member? Register Now!

You can have EITHER of these players in their prime to build your NBA franchise

You can have EITHER of these players in their prime to build your NBA franchise

Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.
[ Edited by jrg on Feb 4, 2010 at 8:55 PM ]
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

So it's just your obsession with Kobe that makes you drag him into this. Got it.


Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

So it's just your obsession with Kobe that makes you drag him into this. Got it.



Yeah..ya got me there Stoney.

Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jordan. He's the greatest of all time, AND he's a damn good leader.

Shaq is a great center, but he couldn't win without a superstar, and can't carry his team.

True, but neither could Jordan. He never made it out of the 1st Round without Pippen, and Pippen led the same team to 55 wins when MJ was replaced with Pete Myers. Pippen was a Top 50 player of all-time, and IMO is in the Top 25-30.

Olajuwon in 1994 was the only player in my lifetime to win a title without another superstar on his team.

I agree to a certain extent. Olajuwon was the best center I have ever seen play and maybe the best C ever IMO, but you can argue that the only reason he won his titles was because Jordan was out of the league at the time.
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.
stoney i think u need to have a smoke
Originally posted by phatbutskinny:
stoney i think u need to have a smoke

You assuming I'm not is your FAIL.
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by YourHuckleberry:
Jordan. He's the greatest of all time, AND he's a damn good leader.

Shaq is a great center, but he couldn't win without a superstar, and can't carry his team.

True, but neither could Jordan. He never made it out of the 1st Round without Pippen, and Pippen led the same team to 55 wins when MJ was replaced with Pete Myers. Pippen was a Top 50 player of all-time, and IMO is in the Top 25-30.

Olajuwon in 1994 was the only player in my lifetime to win a title without another superstar on his team.

I agree to a certain extent. Olajuwon was the best center I have ever seen play and maybe the best C ever IMO, but you can argue that the only reason he won his titles was because Jordan was out of the league at the time.

Yeah, that's definitely a fair point.
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.


We already laugh at you. There's nothing you can do about it.
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by StOnEy333:
Originally posted by jrg:
Originally posted by TheSixthRing:
Originally posted by jrg:
Lol, Stoney I know what he asked.

What I'm saying is..this shouldn't even be a debate. The choice is obviously Jordan.

But prime Shaq is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> prime Mo Williams

And is a lot closer than your example.

Fair enough.

And the voice of reason that you choose to listen to is SIXTH, of all people?

Is there something wrong with that?

Yeah, it's hilarious. HAHA at you. Everybody laugh. Laugh at j.



Sometimes you're just too much of yourself, brah. Way too much.


We already laugh at you. There's nothing you can do about it.

Then I'm doing my job, and doing it well.