Maybe our Oline isn't as bad as people say it is. | Page 11

Jan 20, 2018 at 9:48 PM

Niner4ever
Veteran
Posts: 2,838

Originally posted by frenchmov:
Our line was bad even after Jimmy. Look at how many hits he took. Now of course he wasn't sacked as much because he processes things so quickly but Jimmy cannot and will not survive with an equally s**tty line moving forward. We need, at minimum, a new G and a new C. We probably need 2starting G's and C though. In addition, we need a better backup than Zane beadles at T.

This is the winner post of the thread. Discussion is over now lock this thread.

Jan 21, 2018 at 12:54 AM

#152

lamontb
Veteran
Posts: 30,033

Tomlinson and Kilgore are the main weak links. Fusco is at least servicable. But all 3 need to be upgraded ASAP.

[ Edited by lamontb on Jan 21, 2018 at 1:12 AM ]

Jan 21, 2018 at 1:00 AM

#153

pdizo916
Member
Posts: 38,241

Originally posted by lamontb:
Tomlinson and Kilgore ate the main weak links. Fusco is at least servicable. But all 3 need to be upgraded ASAP.

Jan 21, 2018 at 9:01 AM

#154

NCommand
Hall of Fame
Posts: 123,365

Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Tomlinson and Kilgore ate the main weak links. Fusco is at least servicable. But all 3 need to be upgraded ASAP.

+1

Jan 21, 2018 at 9:08 AM

#155

LVJay
Veteran
Posts: 27,847

Maybe earth isn't round like people say it is. Maybe water isn't really wet, we're just imagining things

Jan 21, 2018 at 9:48 AM

#156

cciowa
Veteran
Posts: 60,541

Originally posted by lamontb:
Tomlinson and Kilgore are the main weak links. Fusco is at least servicable. But all 3 need to be upgraded ASAP.

i have yet to see one logical reason why those two idiots should be resigned. they are cheap and know the system is weak man

Jan 21, 2018 at 10:23 AM

#157

English
Moderator
Posts: 40,226

Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Tomlinson and Kilgore are the main weak links. Fusco is at least servicable. But all 3 need to be upgraded ASAP.

i have yet to see one logical reason why those two idiots should be resigned. they are cheap and know the system is weak man

Fusco would be the only one I would consider bringing back. He may or may not win a role in the team.

Jan 23, 2018 at 2:45 PM

#158

LasVegasWally
Veteran
Posts: 24,264

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by pdizo916:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Tomlinson and Kilgore ate the main weak links. Fusco is at least servicable. But all 3 need to be upgraded ASAP.

+1

+2

Jan 23, 2018 at 4:18 PM

#159

LifelongNiner
Veteran
Posts: 22,358

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by lamontb:
Tomlinson and Kilgore are the main weak links. Fusco is at least servicable. But all 3 need to be upgraded ASAP.

i have yet to see one logical reason why those two idiots should be resigned. they are cheap and know the system is weak man

Spot on. What are they going to be, training camp fodder? I'd rather sign a guard with talent that can play in this scheme.

Jan 23, 2018 at 11:02 PM

#160

pasodoc9er
Veteran
Posts: 21,009

Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by lamontb:
Tomlinson and Kilgore ate the main weak links. Fusco is at least servicable. But all 3 need to be upgraded ASAP.

+1

+2

+3

+4(/quote)

Oh, and the statement that "our OL isn't as bad as people says it is"...yeah. Yeah it is every bit as bad as people says it is.

[ Edited by pasodoc9er on Jan 23, 2018 at 11:04 PM ]

Jan 23, 2018 at 11:36 PM

#161

Watters32
Member
Posts: 543

Address pass rush and coverage before oline.

Eagles/falcons/Vikings etc

Pass rush and coverage.

Jan 24, 2018 at 12:07 AM

#162

jcs
Veteran
Posts: 38,582

Originally posted by Watters32:
Address pass rush and coverage before oline.

Eagles/falcons/Vikings etc

Pass rush and coverage.

All losers in the playoffs.

Jan 24, 2018 at 3:37 AM

#163

pdizo916
Member
Posts: 38,241

Originally posted by English:
Let me say it again, then. WE NEED THREE INTERIOR LINEMEN. Oh, if Garnett has broken through that will be fine. But I am not interested in gambling our franchise qb on him right now. And anyone who selected the user name you selected should be in tune with this.

By the way, I dont think anyone has suggested that our O line should protect Garappolo from getting any hits. This is taking an argument to the absurd.

English and I actually agree on something?

Jan 24, 2018 at 3:45 AM

#164

SmokeCrabtrees
Veteran
Posts: 15,580

Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by English:
Let me say it again, then. WE NEED THREE INTERIOR LINEMEN. Oh, if Garnett has broken through that will be fine. But I am not interested in gambling our franchise qb on him right now. And anyone who selected the user name you selected should be in tune with this.

By the way, I dont think anyone has suggested that our O line should protect Garappolo from getting any hits. This is taking an argument to the absurd.

English and I actually agree on something?

Jan 24, 2018 at 4:07 AM

#165

English
Moderator
Posts: 40,226

Originally posted by pdizo916:
Originally posted by English:
Let me say it again, then. WE NEED THREE INTERIOR LINEMEN. Oh, if Garnett has broken through that will be fine. But I am not interested in gambling our franchise qb on him right now. And anyone who selected the user name you selected should be in tune with this.

By the way, I dont think anyone has suggested that our O line should protect Garappolo from getting any hits. This is taking an argument to the absurd.

English and I actually agree on something?

At least we agree on the important thing!