WR Marquise "Flash" Goodwin (traded to PHI)

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by IdahoNiner:

Originally posted by dioworld:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Lynch took a gamble on this signing. He can come back and not be the same player again, or he can come back and continue where he left off, and then you would have to pay him 10+ mil a year.

Everything is a gamble in the NFL

LOL. This is not a gamble. We extended the guy three years and he is only guaranteed 10. LOL. The overreaction is insane.

EVERYONE knew Goodwin would be extended. EVERYONE.

If you didn't, i have to question if you even watched games last season.

I think by "gamble" he meant that this extension is less expensive than it would be if Goodwin comes back and continues to perform at the level he was with JG. But more expensive than it would be if Goodwin comes back and doesn't have that same level of production.

I somewhat agree, if you only look at if from a production standpoint. To me, Goodwin embodies everything you want in a player and teammate, and that is worth a lot. He's an excellent player that produces, but is also a high character guy that the team feeds off of. Extending him in this manner send him and the team a clear message - if you buy into the system and produce, you will be rewarded.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by IdahoNiner:

Originally posted by dioworld:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Lynch took a gamble on this signing. He can come back and not be the same player again, or he can come back and continue where he left off, and then you would have to pay him 10+ mil a year.

Everything is a gamble in the NFL

LOL. This is not a gamble. We extended the guy three years and he is only guaranteed 10. LOL. The overreaction is insane.

EVERYONE knew Goodwin would be extended. EVERYONE.

If you didn't, i have to question if you even watched games last season.

I think by "gamble" he meant that this extension is less expensive than it would be if Goodwin comes back and continues to perform at the level he was with JG. But more expensive than it would be if Goodwin comes back and doesn't have that same level of production.

I somewhat agree, if you only look at if from a production standpoint. To me, Goodwin embodies everything you want in a player and teammate, and that is worth a lot. He's an excellent player that produces, but is also a high character guy that the team feeds off of. Extending him in this manner send him and the team a clear message - if you buy into the system and produce, you will be rewarded.

at least you can read

Originally posted by RishikeshA:

He made plays all over the field and wasn't afraid to go over the middle. Never had a QB in Buffalo, he has one now.

Originally posted by tatdwolf49:
Don't think we'll go after Taylor Gabriel now ...

Originally posted by tatdwolf49:
Don't think we'll go after Taylor Gabriel now ...

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Great re-signing I still think we should go get Allen Robinson.

Originally posted by SteveYoung:

Meh. Garcon is going to be a beast on those playaction crossers. He was well on his way to 1000 yards with Hoyer and Beathard. I think he puts up 1200 easily.

WR1- Pierre Garcon
WR2- Marquise Goodwin
Slot- Trent Taylor
TE- George Kittle
RB- Dion Lewis

Wow

Originally posted by FlayvaMeister:

Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:

Just to clarify since some have asked: #49ers WR Marquise Goodwin's three-year deal is an extension that takes him through the 2021 season. So he still has the original year left on his deal in 2018. Team has rights for next four seasons.

— Nick Wagoner (@nwagoner) March 8, 2018

Paraag, being Paraag